▲ 4651 ▼ It Took 23 Days for Lemmy Posts to Double from 1 Million to 2 Million (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by Paulius@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world 446 comments fedilink hide all child comments Source: https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/dailystats&days=90
[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 266 points 3 years ago (6 children) The content will bring in users. I try to comment on interesting topics to help drive engagement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Cthuwu@lemmy.world 129 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is my thoughts as well. I’ve noticed that once one or two people express interest in a post, it tends to get much more traffic permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Jase@lemmy.world 62 points 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chepox@sopuli.xyz 33 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://xkcd.com/37/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ButWhatDoesItAllMean@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 years ago The world could use more random ass-comments permalink fedilink source parent [–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) I really just prefer genuine content personally. We don't need to astroturf the site. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Jase@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 3 years ago (1 child) You don't understand how my comment is related to yours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Jase@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 3 years ago Oh no, I understand perfectly. You definitely didn't considering your responses. I said "We should all do our best to comment on various posts that have no engagement to encourage others to engage." You did not say that, you said "The more random ass comments the better", which I disagree with. Two completely different factors. One is a genuine engagement with social media. The other is not. If you're insulted because I implied your comments aren't genuine, I'm sorry. Genuine is a very subjective word "natural" might have been a better choice. So to reiterate, I really just prefer natural content personally. We don't need to astroturf the site. Not going to continue this conversation when it started on braindead circumstances and is somehow still going downhill. Goodbye. Baby I can change.. 💙 permalink fedilink source parent [–] GenericJeebus@lemmy.world 58 points 3 years ago (3 children) I used to lurk like crazy on reddit. I had a nearly 12 year old account that mainly had a few comments here and there months apart, and only a few posts but ever since moving to Lemmy I've found myself actually posting relatively frequently to help build some of the smaller communities I'm in that have also migrated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] 1984@lemmy.today 18 points 3 years ago Keep it up. I wish people would bring themself to comment so they count as active users. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Four_lights77@lemm.ee 12 points 3 years ago (1 child) I’m exactly the same. I feel like the opportunity to have a productive conversation on Lemmy is a lot higher. There are fewer of us right now but we are the motivated minority kicking Reddit to the curb for its terrible actions and we want to see Lemmy thrive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago I still check Reddit every couple days on my laptop. I don't think they maintained a majority of their users. Engagement is way down. Most of the posts on my front page are barely hitting 2000 updoots, compared to well over 10,000 prior to July 1 permalink fedilink source parent [–] themeltingclock@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (post comment edit - if you put things inside < > as your entire post, Lemmy will eat it. Cool> permalink fedilink source parent [–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 20 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Only if the content is organic. Look at !photoshopbattles@lemmy.world . Full of bot posts from reddit with 0 comments. Even if one of them gets a comment, it would get drowned out by the subsequent bot posts. Blindly filling a community with bot posts would eventually make people unsub from it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pringles@lemm.ee 16 points 3 years ago* I'm sure those bots are well intended, but I would rather not see bots just copying posts from reddit blindly. When you sort all by new, it's just a swamp of bot posts. Edit: So I checked to verify my claim and most are from @bot@lemmit.online iirc and you can just block that account to stop seeing all the automated posts from reddit permalink fedilink source parent [–] HobbitFoot 10 points 3 years ago It depends on the content. Some of content really depends on OP being in the comments, like AmITheAsshole. Just reposting doesn't give the kind of interaction that the original post would have. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago Ongoing discussion—i.e., comments replying to other comments, not just posts—drives engagement as much as content. If the post-to-comment ratio is too high, active commenters are less likely to encounter each other in the sea of automated posts. permalink fedilink source parent [–] waldyrious@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) You're doing it right. That's exactly how to build momentum! 💪 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [B] 3 points 3 years ago Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/fW8amMCVAJQ Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cthuwu@lemmy.world 129 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is my thoughts as well. I’ve noticed that once one or two people express interest in a post, it tends to get much more traffic permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Jase@lemmy.world 62 points 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chepox@sopuli.xyz 33 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://xkcd.com/37/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ButWhatDoesItAllMean@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 years ago The world could use more random ass-comments permalink fedilink source parent [–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) I really just prefer genuine content personally. We don't need to astroturf the site. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Jase@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 3 years ago (1 child) You don't understand how my comment is related to yours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Jase@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 3 years ago Oh no, I understand perfectly. You definitely didn't considering your responses. I said "We should all do our best to comment on various posts that have no engagement to encourage others to engage." You did not say that, you said "The more random ass comments the better", which I disagree with. Two completely different factors. One is a genuine engagement with social media. The other is not. If you're insulted because I implied your comments aren't genuine, I'm sorry. Genuine is a very subjective word "natural" might have been a better choice. So to reiterate, I really just prefer natural content personally. We don't need to astroturf the site. Not going to continue this conversation when it started on braindead circumstances and is somehow still going downhill. Goodbye. Baby I can change.. 💙 permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Jase@lemmy.world 62 points 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chepox@sopuli.xyz 33 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://xkcd.com/37/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ButWhatDoesItAllMean@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 years ago The world could use more random ass-comments permalink fedilink source parent [–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) I really just prefer genuine content personally. We don't need to astroturf the site. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Jase@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 3 years ago (1 child) You don't understand how my comment is related to yours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Jase@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 3 years ago Oh no, I understand perfectly. You definitely didn't considering your responses. I said "We should all do our best to comment on various posts that have no engagement to encourage others to engage." You did not say that, you said "The more random ass comments the better", which I disagree with. Two completely different factors. One is a genuine engagement with social media. The other is not. If you're insulted because I implied your comments aren't genuine, I'm sorry. Genuine is a very subjective word "natural" might have been a better choice. So to reiterate, I really just prefer natural content personally. We don't need to astroturf the site. Not going to continue this conversation when it started on braindead circumstances and is somehow still going downhill. Goodbye. Baby I can change.. 💙 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chepox@sopuli.xyz 33 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://xkcd.com/37/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ButWhatDoesItAllMean@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 years ago The world could use more random ass-comments permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ButWhatDoesItAllMean@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 years ago The world could use more random ass-comments permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) I really just prefer genuine content personally. We don't need to astroturf the site. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Jase@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 3 years ago (1 child) You don't understand how my comment is related to yours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Jase@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 3 years ago Oh no, I understand perfectly. You definitely didn't considering your responses. I said "We should all do our best to comment on various posts that have no engagement to encourage others to engage." You did not say that, you said "The more random ass comments the better", which I disagree with. Two completely different factors. One is a genuine engagement with social media. The other is not. If you're insulted because I implied your comments aren't genuine, I'm sorry. Genuine is a very subjective word "natural" might have been a better choice. So to reiterate, I really just prefer natural content personally. We don't need to astroturf the site. Not going to continue this conversation when it started on braindead circumstances and is somehow still going downhill. Goodbye. Baby I can change.. 💙 permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Jase@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 3 years ago (1 child) You don't understand how my comment is related to yours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Jase@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 3 years ago Oh no, I understand perfectly. You definitely didn't considering your responses. I said "We should all do our best to comment on various posts that have no engagement to encourage others to engage." You did not say that, you said "The more random ass comments the better", which I disagree with. Two completely different factors. One is a genuine engagement with social media. The other is not. If you're insulted because I implied your comments aren't genuine, I'm sorry. Genuine is a very subjective word "natural" might have been a better choice. So to reiterate, I really just prefer natural content personally. We don't need to astroturf the site. Not going to continue this conversation when it started on braindead circumstances and is somehow still going downhill. Goodbye. Baby I can change.. 💙 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 3 years ago (1 child) You don't understand how my comment is related to yours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Jase@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 3 years ago Oh no, I understand perfectly. You definitely didn't considering your responses. I said "We should all do our best to comment on various posts that have no engagement to encourage others to engage." You did not say that, you said "The more random ass comments the better", which I disagree with. Two completely different factors. One is a genuine engagement with social media. The other is not. If you're insulted because I implied your comments aren't genuine, I'm sorry. Genuine is a very subjective word "natural" might have been a better choice. So to reiterate, I really just prefer natural content personally. We don't need to astroturf the site. Not going to continue this conversation when it started on braindead circumstances and is somehow still going downhill. Goodbye. Baby I can change.. 💙 permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Jase@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 3 years ago Oh no, I understand perfectly. You definitely didn't considering your responses. I said "We should all do our best to comment on various posts that have no engagement to encourage others to engage." You did not say that, you said "The more random ass comments the better", which I disagree with. Two completely different factors. One is a genuine engagement with social media. The other is not. If you're insulted because I implied your comments aren't genuine, I'm sorry. Genuine is a very subjective word "natural" might have been a better choice. So to reiterate, I really just prefer natural content personally. We don't need to astroturf the site. Not going to continue this conversation when it started on braindead circumstances and is somehow still going downhill. Goodbye. Baby I can change.. 💙 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 3 years ago Oh no, I understand perfectly. You definitely didn't considering your responses. I said "We should all do our best to comment on various posts that have no engagement to encourage others to engage." You did not say that, you said "The more random ass comments the better", which I disagree with. Two completely different factors. One is a genuine engagement with social media. The other is not. If you're insulted because I implied your comments aren't genuine, I'm sorry. Genuine is a very subjective word "natural" might have been a better choice. So to reiterate, I really just prefer natural content personally. We don't need to astroturf the site. Not going to continue this conversation when it started on braindead circumstances and is somehow still going downhill. Goodbye. Baby I can change.. 💙 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GenericJeebus@lemmy.world 58 points 3 years ago (3 children) I used to lurk like crazy on reddit. I had a nearly 12 year old account that mainly had a few comments here and there months apart, and only a few posts but ever since moving to Lemmy I've found myself actually posting relatively frequently to help build some of the smaller communities I'm in that have also migrated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] 1984@lemmy.today 18 points 3 years ago Keep it up. I wish people would bring themself to comment so they count as active users. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Four_lights77@lemm.ee 12 points 3 years ago (1 child) I’m exactly the same. I feel like the opportunity to have a productive conversation on Lemmy is a lot higher. There are fewer of us right now but we are the motivated minority kicking Reddit to the curb for its terrible actions and we want to see Lemmy thrive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago I still check Reddit every couple days on my laptop. I don't think they maintained a majority of their users. Engagement is way down. Most of the posts on my front page are barely hitting 2000 updoots, compared to well over 10,000 prior to July 1 permalink fedilink source parent [–] themeltingclock@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (post comment edit - if you put things inside < > as your entire post, Lemmy will eat it. Cool> permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 18 points 3 years ago Keep it up. I wish people would bring themself to comment so they count as active users. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Four_lights77@lemm.ee 12 points 3 years ago (1 child) I’m exactly the same. I feel like the opportunity to have a productive conversation on Lemmy is a lot higher. There are fewer of us right now but we are the motivated minority kicking Reddit to the curb for its terrible actions and we want to see Lemmy thrive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago I still check Reddit every couple days on my laptop. I don't think they maintained a majority of their users. Engagement is way down. Most of the posts on my front page are barely hitting 2000 updoots, compared to well over 10,000 prior to July 1 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago I still check Reddit every couple days on my laptop. I don't think they maintained a majority of their users. Engagement is way down. Most of the posts on my front page are barely hitting 2000 updoots, compared to well over 10,000 prior to July 1 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] themeltingclock@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (post comment edit - if you put things inside < > as your entire post, Lemmy will eat it. Cool> permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 20 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Only if the content is organic. Look at !photoshopbattles@lemmy.world . Full of bot posts from reddit with 0 comments. Even if one of them gets a comment, it would get drowned out by the subsequent bot posts. Blindly filling a community with bot posts would eventually make people unsub from it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pringles@lemm.ee 16 points 3 years ago* I'm sure those bots are well intended, but I would rather not see bots just copying posts from reddit blindly. When you sort all by new, it's just a swamp of bot posts. Edit: So I checked to verify my claim and most are from @bot@lemmit.online iirc and you can just block that account to stop seeing all the automated posts from reddit permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pringles@lemm.ee 16 points 3 years ago* I'm sure those bots are well intended, but I would rather not see bots just copying posts from reddit blindly. When you sort all by new, it's just a swamp of bot posts. Edit: So I checked to verify my claim and most are from @bot@lemmit.online iirc and you can just block that account to stop seeing all the automated posts from reddit permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HobbitFoot 10 points 3 years ago It depends on the content. Some of content really depends on OP being in the comments, like AmITheAsshole. Just reposting doesn't give the kind of interaction that the original post would have. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago Ongoing discussion—i.e., comments replying to other comments, not just posts—drives engagement as much as content. If the post-to-comment ratio is too high, active commenters are less likely to encounter each other in the sea of automated posts. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] waldyrious@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) You're doing it right. That's exactly how to build momentum! 💪 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [B] 3 points 3 years ago Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/fW8amMCVAJQ Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks [B] 3 points 3 years ago Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/fW8amMCVAJQ Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub. permalink fedilink source parent