this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
653 points (88.6% liked)
Political Memes
5405 readers
5092 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Like I said: “I’d suspect the numbers would still be worse than they should be”
But also, you’re doing it again. You’re saying “despite the latter [Afghanistan] lasting 20 years,” but dude you linked images from 2006. It hadn’t been 20 years yet. In fact, that data is from nearly 20 years ago!
That is, again, extremely misleading data to support the argument you’re making.
I literally asked why it is different today from 2006.
How is that misleading?
I made no attempt to hide it was from 2006.
It's also a question you didn't answer. So it's pretty rich to suggest I'm the one being dishonest here.
How would I know if it is or isn’t different today based on your comment? How am I supposed to answer that question? By asking that, you are asserting that it is different today. Yet you have given no numbers for what it is today for the same countries on that image.
You know that, and you are trying to sidestep me now while accusing me of sidestepping. Why is that? You said in the beginning of your comment:
You are saying here that those wars lasted a long time, and one lasted 20 years, and despite that, Americans couldn’t find those countries on maps during those wars. But the data is from the beginning of that time period. So after 20 years yes obviously the numbers would change. But that data doesn’t say that. That data is the starting point. A lazy reader might very easily think that data supported your point. Same as your previous comment I took issue with.
That's one way to pretend you never said I was being misleading about the year when I wasn't, I suppose.
Do you have a specific rebuke for something I said where you can logically point out where I’m wrong or are you just hand-waving?
Yes, my specific rebuke is that I was not misleading when I showed what were clearly charts from 2006 since they said they were from 2006 at the bottom and then asking what is different today.
I know you think we can move past that lie, but I'm not going to.