this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
140 points (93.8% liked)

Technology

1374 readers
236 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The probe hones in on one of Tesla's most eyebrow-raising decisions when it comes to its driver assistance package: the insistence on exclusively relying on camera sensors instead of LiDAR and radar like its competitors, which CEO Elon Musk has long derided as a "crutch."

In 2022, the company went all-in on cameras, ditching ultrasonic sensors in its vehicles altogether — a decision that could prove to be a major mistake as it struggles to catch up with its competition and has now promised robust self-driving capabilities to owners who may lack the necessary sensor hardware.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t think it was a mistake. I think he just blatantly lied about its capabilities for years.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can honestly believe that he thought it's gonna work. He knows fuck all about anything but he still makes his bad decisions with confidence and thinks he's always right.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can almost guarantee there was at least one engineer who tried to explain why ditching LIDAR was a bad idea, and he ignored them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

https://x.com/yoloption/status/1595213678147764224/photo/1

Yeah apparently it is a major part of employees' jobs to know how to present good ideas to this fool in a way that he won't shoot it down because he thinks he knows things.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably fired them and that guy went to a competitor is more likely.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I almost added that part, but didn't want some Musk stans to jump down my throat

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Never worry about those Musk stan losers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Thought process goes like this:

"What's slowing us down, hardware-wise? These lidars are expensive and a pain in the ass. Let's disrupt the status quo and ditch them and just use cameras. People drive around just fine with just stereo vision, after all. It might be hard but once we do it we'll be way ahead of the competition."