this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
467 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4176 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former President Donald Trump heaped praise on authoritarian Chinese President Xi Jinping during a lengthy interview Friday with the podcaster Joe Rogan.

“We’re dealing with the smartest people,” Trump said, referring to the leaders of U.S. adversaries, about an hour and a half into their conversation.

“They hate when I say, you know, when the press — when I called President Xi, [the press] said, ‘Well, he called President Xi brilliant.’ Well, he’s a brilliant guy. He controls 1.4 billion people with an iron fist. I mean, he’s a brilliant guy, whether you like it or not. And they go crazy.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This has been up for two hours, I wonder where the propagandists hollering about genocide are.

Edit, four hours now: It must be acceptable to genocide Uyghurs, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I suspect that most of them don’t really care about genocide or the welfare of others in general. It’s a self-righteous bandwagon for them to jump on.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At this point, I'm just posting this graphic

Anytime I run into the "Don't Vote Harris, that will stop Genocide!" camp

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And the democrats are at least working towards a cease fire. Trump would let Bibi turn his enemies lands to glass because Trump only cares about Trump.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Trump's team has literally been caught sabotaging peace talks, while he runs on "The Democrats will not stop the genocide that my campaign wants to do more of!"

Reminds me of Iran-Contra....

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Those are in the Kamala threads doing what they're paid to do

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

They don't need to be paid to be ignorant. A lot of people don't understand nuance or how the American political system works and it shows in those threads.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm honestly still skeptical of that, It seems to me like Lemmy would be too small to be an efficient use of a paid shill's time, vs having them go to a mainstream social media platform. I think they're either genuine in intent but have twisted themselves into a completely counterproductive idea of what to do out of anger at how things in the world have gone, or in some cases are people trolling for a position they don't support, but who are doing it for free to advance their own position rather than for a paycheck.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think most of these folks you find on Lemmy are just useful idiots whose stupidity/ignorance/naiveté has been weaponized on other platforms.

I'm sure we're on someone's sentiment management radar by now but I'm not sure if we're populated enough for a truly serious effort to be mounted. That's coming at some point though, of that I have no doubt.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I could see a cunning propagandist trying to get a strong foothold early in order to "claim territory." Remember voat?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

We all knew that. Just like it is acceptable to jail citizens for writing mean things about the government on the internet.