this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
77 points (97.5% liked)

technology

23303 readers
17 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 62 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Seeing Linus Torvalds' talk like a BlueAnon lib was very disappointing.

Why does free, international software have to abide by US sanctions, anyway?

Edit: Apparently the Linux Foundation is based in the US. I got it.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

So long as the foundation and the official "owners" of the kernel are US based, then the real answer is "because it's the law". Despite the fact the kernel is maintained and used throughout the globe, other countries' laws are entirely irrelevant, but people who employed in a country are typically held to its laws.

The real mistake was having a registered company in the US that they're unable to realistically move abroad.

In a world with sense, someone vaguely accountable in a new country will fork the kernel, that just becomes the de facto new kernel, doesn't seem likely. We can only wait and see.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

For the same reason Google has to abide by EU rules and regulations and VW has to abide by American laws and Disney has to edit their movies for China.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

gee all those entities are for-profit, why does Linux need to prioritize profits again?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Okay you’re still missing the point. The same reason the Red Cross or Doctors Sans Borders needs to abide by laws in several different countries.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

the red cross has to arbitrarily ban russians due to a proxy war for nazis?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Probably. I'm sure they're obligated to restrict their operations in all kinds of ways.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You're probably right, but do their leaders tend to broadcast themselves agreeing with these restrictions?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

No. That's a good point. This guy seems to be a rare asshole. In fact, all I know about Linux is that it has something to do with this dummy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe not, but they probably has to be very careful about taking money from anybody with Russian citizen ship. Also probably, now has to be careful about having people with Russian citizenship, ties to Russian businesses, or the Russian government in any leadership or critical infrastructure positions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

profit has nothing to do with it. Its about where you reside or do business.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

profit has nothing to do with it

hahaha

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

lmfao got eem. at the end of the day yeah, its "profit" in an indirect way, but my point still stands.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

if being based in the USA is more important than not arbitrarily banning Russians then fuck Linux