People's Court

448 readers

89 users here now

This is a community for Lemmygrad users and admins to discuss administrative issues in a more transparent manner

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

-1

Should loli posting be allowed? (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 14 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Basically as title, I wanted to hear if posts such as below are acceptable, since as it stands, it doesn't break any of Lemmygrads rules. Frankly, the post is very weird to me, and the comments are bizarre. People talking about how they want to "dominated" by a 14 year old is imo not okay, especially not when it's on a post of a drawing of a child with clear undertones. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the post since I'm not an evangelion fan, but I thought it was noteworthy enough to bring up here.

https://lemmygrad.ml/post/5810839

EDIT: The post has been removed, so I guess that's a no?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 16 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I'm surprised this hasn't come up before already. I'm generally on the boat of 'no loli posting' outright. It's a messy moralistic debate that I haven't seen sufficiently settled yet, but most people don't want to chance across sexualized underage girls/discussions of it and no one wants to get into a debate about it. One side is inevitably called pedophiles for engaging in it and the other side can justifiably become extremely heated.

Most well adjusted communities with cultures you want to spend time in outright ban the discussion. Avoid the mess all together. There's not many ways to slice 'sexualizing underage girls' without pulling up a rotten slice.