this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
140 points (98.6% liked)

askchapo

22722 readers
176 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't watch cable news and I don't pay attention to Jeff Teidrich or whoever so I don't know where this bullshit is coming from. At least one person responding is nominally anti-genocide, so I don't think that's the reason. Another came back with something about the funding bill for FEMA as if it's a gotcha.

What's their logic?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What this lib said. They actually believe the obstructionist bullshit and think Biden would help if he could but his hands are tied. Fairy tale shit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Moderate, not liberal nor conservative.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Liberals, conservatives and moderates in the narrow sense that you are using those terms are just mildly different flavors of liberal ideology, in the original sense of the word.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What "narrow sense"? I literally just said "Moderate, not liberal nor conservative."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In the narrow, U.S. centric sense that you think those are categorically different things when in reality conservatives and moderates are also liberals ideologically.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hmm, that was not my intent at all. Is there a more appropriate or accurate word you can suggest for somebody that does not fit nicely into either of the two popular US political Ideologies and depending on the topic will either side with a party (which party depends on the topic) or think that nobody has presented a good idea?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Independent voter or non-partisan I guess.

Your terminology is fine in the narrow context of talking to other American libs about mainstream American politics but you’re commenting on a forum full of communists so to us you’re a lib and calling yourself a moderate is meaningless hair-splitting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago

Good to know. Thanks for the info.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lol. if you think there's a functional (key word) difference between the two, beyond aesthetics, you're a LIB. Sorry, I don't make the rules. Take it up with the parliamentarian.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Did you just call Trump and the entire Republican party libs?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, I would prefer to call them chuds, but yes colloquially they would fit as libs. Both parties can get their panties in a bunch over culture war theater all they want, but at the end of the day their ultimate goal is serving Capital and dismantling any aspect of government that isn't protecting private property or funneling wealth to the top.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Interesting. I have not had the word "lib" explained in such a way. I am more familiar with "snowflake" being used in that context.

I believe that most people associate the word "lib" with a political ideology and by using it you are, even if unwittingly, saying that you think one party is better than the other and should be in power.

I agree and share in your disgust of the current government of the USA. Neither party seems interested in helping the American people unless it profits them directly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I believe that most people associate the word "lib" with a political ideology and by using it you are, even if unwittingly, saying that you think one party is better than the other and should be in power.

You can thank Rush Limbaugh for that. He spent his entire career using Liberals as an epithet meant to give the illusion of distance between the socially liberal Democrats and the socially regressive Republicans, but both Parties fell under the umbrella of Classical Liberalism in their Economic policies. We don't hold to such illusions here on hexbear. If you take a class based analysis you quickly see that the two "sides" are still moving in lockstep towards the goals mentioned earlier. Lib is especially insulting for us, as it's our politics they're wearing as a mask as they do evil shit. But no, you'd be hard-pressed to find a preference among us for which party should be performing genocide. Chud stands cannibalistic human under dweller, if you still have any misconceptions about how we feel about Trump and his ilk.

You may find the classic Yellow Parenti video interesting. Seems up your alley and I think you'd find it quite enlightening as to our views around here. Plus, Parenti is just a joy to listen to. Dude spoke at the Whitehouse.💁

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xP8CzlFhc14

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interesting. Thanks for the info. I'll take a look at that link.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Welcome. Enjoy. mario-thumbs-up