this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
451 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2067 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 191 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The supreme Court says you can just kill them bro

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 month ago

Presidential act

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Put the bloated military budget to good use for once.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For once? Are you not familiar with the whole situation in Ukraine?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

we're barely using our military there, as a percentage

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I agree we should just straight up bomb the fuck out of Russia and assassinate Putin.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Finally, someone around here speaking my language.

Bare minimum we should be leveraging cyber power if we aren't going full kinetic.

Fuck Russia.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

Counter-point, we should scale our involvement in the whole thing waaaay back and spend that money on things like infrastructure, healthcare, and education.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah. We should be giving them more. But at least we're giving some.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Guess you don't know what using the military means. We are financing and supplying them only.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The phrase used was bloated military budget, which definitely includes supplying and financing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No it doesn't. Most are government contracts and funding is from congress. A completely different pot from the defense budget. We don't sell U.S. weapons to foreign countries. We sell them watered down versions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Wait, so your premise hangs on thinking that synonyms mean different things?

Imagine, for a moment, me waving my hands over my head while bobbling my head back and forth in a syncopated rhythm, as I walk away, muttering. “Oh, but the defense budget isn’t the military budget!” “No, we’re just pretending colloquialisms don’t exist for the purposes of this argument.” “There’s always at least one!”

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago

Five words: I feared for my country

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

and have a martyr death fueling a potentially even worse successor?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Toss him in prison then. Make it very public, announce that he's being arrested for treason and cuff him at one of his rallies.

But let's be real here, the Supreme Court's ruling only actually applies to the Toupee, since he's the one who put them there.