this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
159 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13499 readers
905 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you also suggesting it's impossible for specific times that it really matters, such as medical information?

Firstly, how do you filter for medical information in a way that works 100% of the time. You are going to miss a lot of medical questions because NLI has countless edge cases. Secondly, you need to make sure your fact checkers are accurate, which is very hard to do. Lastly, you are still getting millions and millions of medical questions per day and you would need tens of thousands of medical fact checkers that need to be perfectly accurate. Having fact checkers will lull people into a false sense of security, which will be very bad when they inevitably get things wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Firstly, how do you filter for medical information in a way that works 100% of the time

That is a good question, and it goes double for what you're apparently running interference for. How exactly does a sheer volume of bullshit justify bullshit being generated by LLMs in medical fields?

You are going to miss a lot of medical questions

Yes, and the magic of LLMs means those medical questions are going to be missed a lot more often and faster than ever before.

Having fact checkers will lull people into a false sense of security, which will be very bad when they inevitably get things wrong.

That's an amazing take: the errors aren't as bad as attempts to mitigate the flood of errors from the planet-burning bullshit machines. galaxy-brain

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

If you see a note saying "This was confirmed to be correct by our well-trained human fact checkers" and one saying "[Gemini] can make mistakes. Check important info.", you are more likely to believe the first than the second. The solution here is to look at actual articles with credited authors, not to have an army of people reviewing every single medical query.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm still not seeing a safe or even meaningful use case for the treat printers here, especially not for the additional electricity and waste carbon costs. Were medical data queries impossible before LLMs? No, they were not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

LLM usage here doesn't help, that's true. But medical queries weren't good before LLM's either, just because it's an incredibly complex field with many edge cases. There is a reason self diagnosis is dangerous and it isn't because of technology.technology.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

LLM usage here doesn't help

Yes, I'm glad we can agree on that.

The rest of what you were saying seems kind of like a pointless derail because you were defending something that's already indefensibly bad for its supposed use case here.