▲ 1705 ▼ oh no! think of the stock market! (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by vinyl@lemmy.world to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world 401 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] LuckyBoy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Well, you can use dams. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Lorgres@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) The problem is really down to finding places where you can actually build something like a hydroelectric power plant. You need a large area you can safely flood. (No villages in the area or only villages you can buy out the owners of) or a high up lake. The area to flood needs to have the geology required to construct a dam safely. And finally, the area needs to be pretty high up and have an area below you can direct the outgoing water to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LuckyBoy@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Yeah, but there are already built hydroeletric dams that can be reused like that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] maniii@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago so-called "gravity batteries" is pretty much exactly a dam with a mini-dam/reservoir at the bottom. When there is an excess, you run the motor to reverse the waterflow to pump uphill into a highe-elevation water retention pond/mini-dam. This also helps reduce the amount of outflow water "lost" due to high-demand. Since you could take almost a day to fill the bottom reservoir and spend "wind"/solar to pump back the "lost" water downstream back into the higher-level reservoir. Even if things are inefficient wind/solar are "renewable", so you can keep "wasting" excess to replenish the dam and still make enough money back ( think in-terms of drought, flooding, windy, sunny, cloudy, etc ) you can basically keep the high-output "system" always topped-up with water. And still supply water + electricity as it is needed. There is no "downside". Not everyone agrees. So opinions can differ. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lorgres@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) The problem is really down to finding places where you can actually build something like a hydroelectric power plant. You need a large area you can safely flood. (No villages in the area or only villages you can buy out the owners of) or a high up lake. The area to flood needs to have the geology required to construct a dam safely. And finally, the area needs to be pretty high up and have an area below you can direct the outgoing water to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LuckyBoy@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Yeah, but there are already built hydroeletric dams that can be reused like that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LuckyBoy@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Yeah, but there are already built hydroeletric dams that can be reused like that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] maniii@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago so-called "gravity batteries" is pretty much exactly a dam with a mini-dam/reservoir at the bottom. When there is an excess, you run the motor to reverse the waterflow to pump uphill into a highe-elevation water retention pond/mini-dam. This also helps reduce the amount of outflow water "lost" due to high-demand. Since you could take almost a day to fill the bottom reservoir and spend "wind"/solar to pump back the "lost" water downstream back into the higher-level reservoir. Even if things are inefficient wind/solar are "renewable", so you can keep "wasting" excess to replenish the dam and still make enough money back ( think in-terms of drought, flooding, windy, sunny, cloudy, etc ) you can basically keep the high-output "system" always topped-up with water. And still supply water + electricity as it is needed. There is no "downside". Not everyone agrees. So opinions can differ. permalink fedilink source parent