▲ 259 ▼ FAA grounds SpaceX after rocket falls over in flames. (www.voanews.com) submitted 2 years ago by True@lemy.lol to c/technology@lemmy.world 68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 122 points 2 years ago (26 children) Those two astronauts are never coming down at this rate permalink fedilink source hideshow 26 child comments replies: [+] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 50 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (12 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [+] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -41 points 2 years ago (11 children) Sorry, what? Boeing is willing to pay for spacex not being perfect? And we should put astronauts on known safety risks because Challenger and Columbia weren't enough for you? Look, I get it. Everyone is influencer-pilled. But this isn't even reddit: it is fricking lemmy. So how about trying to respond to topics and discussions rather than just non-existent karma and engagement farming with non sequitors? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] SARGE@startrek.website 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -38 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Sorry, did I miss something? Boeing took over the FAA? JESUS GOD DAMNED CHRIST!!! WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE!!! Now THAT is news. It has nothing to do with "trying to solve this problem" and pretending it does is just an obnoxious strawman. The issue is coming into a completely unrelated thread to spew some idiocy because your favorite influencer does the same. It is engagement farming for absolutely zero reason. The ONLY mention of Boeing in that article was that they were being considered for a fallback. Which also includes misinformation about NASA deeming it unsafe (as opposed to not as safe/unnecessarily risky when there are safer options). Which.. is an FAA and NASA decision. Because you can bet spacex would gladly fly their rockets if they were allowed to as well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago The issue is coming into a completely unrelated thread to spew some idiocy Good to know you're on the same page as the rest of us regarding whatever it is you're comments have to do with anything. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago It is engagement farming for absolutely zero reason. So what? Should we ban people posting memes too? Should we ban the engagement system/up vote system? Like what's your point here? That people share ideas and thoughts? Wow, what news. The astronauts in space are a big deal and the latest development had SpaceX rescuing them which is why that person brought it up. They weren't bringing up Boeing originally, they were bringing up the astronaut story since it all ties together. If SpaceX is grounded, how will they get those astronauts? And then the next person points out that Boeing and most CEOs tend to feel like worker deaths are the cost of business. That's pretty apropos when talking about those astronauts getting stuck up there. Worker solidarity and all. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago (4 children) You replied to the wrong comment. Or you need to take your meds. Idk which. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) ¿PNLD? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Programa Nacional do Livro e do Material Didático? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No... porque no los dos permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago porque no los dos Ah! Haha yes I agree permalink fedilink source parent [–] mods_mum@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago You missed it by a mile permalink fedilink source parent [+] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (6 children) Don't worry, I'm thinking about starting my own rocket company so we can go get them! In our first year, I plan to deploy at least 3 fully functional 1/50th scale prototypes. That's really what sets us apart from the rest. Our commitment to 1/50th scale prototypes. I can't wait, it's going to be pretty sweet! So, the plan is to launch a rocket carrying a thin string. The astronauts will reach out to catch said string. Then, they will pull a strong chain with the string so they can tie the space station to the chain. Then they will slowly climb down until reaching atmosphere. At the point they will jump with a parachute or continue climbing down slowly. It's their choice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children) This must be that string theory u keep hearing about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is not string theory, this is string practical permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago In theory. But you're right, we're gonna try and try hundreds of millions.... "millions and millions" (of times) as someone smarter than me once said. But by gally (don't know what that means) by gally we'll do it! Even if it doesn't ever work, we'll do it! Because with practice comes.....? permalink fedilink source parent [–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) somewhat relevant xkcd what-if: https://what-if.xkcd.com/157/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago That was phenomenal! 👏 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago Finally the kind of competition that can knock Conksat from it's pedestal! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 7 points 2 years ago This was a landing failure of a booster after returning from it's mission. Boosters have always been expendable one-and-done parts that would be jettisoned to burn up in the atmosphere. Boeing currently has no roadmap for reusable boosters, meanwhile SpaceX has launched this particular booster 23 times! These booster failures are extremely rare and any booster recovery for any space agency/company that isn't SpaceX is notable. SpaceX is the only agency/company that has recovered and reused a booster, and they've done so hundreds of times. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches#Launch_outcomes Note there was 1 launch failure this year which was their first launch failure since 2016, almost 10 years with hundreds of launches between failures. The last booster to be lost on a landing was in 2023 and not even a booster failure but simply rough seas: First booster to fly for the 19th time. Despite the landing being initially successful, the booster later tipped over during transit due to rough seas, high winds and waves, the stage was unable to be secured to the deck for recovery and later tipped over and was destroyed in transit. SpaceX has already equipped newer Falcon boosters with upgraded landing legs that have the capability to self-level and mitigate this type of issue. So in short, yes it is bad that a booster which shouldn't have been lost was. But in terms of crew safety this isn't a huge concern. SpaceX simply has an incredible track record for successful missions and has become the "safe" bet in aerospace permalink fedilink source parent [+] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de -9 points 2 years ago (4 children) I'm not sure if I even would want to board a SpaceX at this rate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (3 children) A booster crash landed, so now you're afraid of the capsule? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) To be fair the booster is an important part permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago Technically almost every booster not made by SpaceX ended up crashlanding. It's just notable that this one wasn't supposed to crashland permalink fedilink source parent [–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago Not for coming down permalink fedilink source parent
[+] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 50 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (12 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [+] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -41 points 2 years ago (11 children) Sorry, what? Boeing is willing to pay for spacex not being perfect? And we should put astronauts on known safety risks because Challenger and Columbia weren't enough for you? Look, I get it. Everyone is influencer-pilled. But this isn't even reddit: it is fricking lemmy. So how about trying to respond to topics and discussions rather than just non-existent karma and engagement farming with non sequitors? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] SARGE@startrek.website 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -38 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Sorry, did I miss something? Boeing took over the FAA? JESUS GOD DAMNED CHRIST!!! WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE!!! Now THAT is news. It has nothing to do with "trying to solve this problem" and pretending it does is just an obnoxious strawman. The issue is coming into a completely unrelated thread to spew some idiocy because your favorite influencer does the same. It is engagement farming for absolutely zero reason. The ONLY mention of Boeing in that article was that they were being considered for a fallback. Which also includes misinformation about NASA deeming it unsafe (as opposed to not as safe/unnecessarily risky when there are safer options). Which.. is an FAA and NASA decision. Because you can bet spacex would gladly fly their rockets if they were allowed to as well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago The issue is coming into a completely unrelated thread to spew some idiocy Good to know you're on the same page as the rest of us regarding whatever it is you're comments have to do with anything. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago It is engagement farming for absolutely zero reason. So what? Should we ban people posting memes too? Should we ban the engagement system/up vote system? Like what's your point here? That people share ideas and thoughts? Wow, what news. The astronauts in space are a big deal and the latest development had SpaceX rescuing them which is why that person brought it up. They weren't bringing up Boeing originally, they were bringing up the astronaut story since it all ties together. If SpaceX is grounded, how will they get those astronauts? And then the next person points out that Boeing and most CEOs tend to feel like worker deaths are the cost of business. That's pretty apropos when talking about those astronauts getting stuck up there. Worker solidarity and all. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago (4 children) You replied to the wrong comment. Or you need to take your meds. Idk which. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) ¿PNLD? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Programa Nacional do Livro e do Material Didático? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No... porque no los dos permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago porque no los dos Ah! Haha yes I agree permalink fedilink source parent [–] mods_mum@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago You missed it by a mile permalink fedilink source parent [+] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -41 points 2 years ago (11 children) Sorry, what? Boeing is willing to pay for spacex not being perfect? And we should put astronauts on known safety risks because Challenger and Columbia weren't enough for you? Look, I get it. Everyone is influencer-pilled. But this isn't even reddit: it is fricking lemmy. So how about trying to respond to topics and discussions rather than just non-existent karma and engagement farming with non sequitors? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] SARGE@startrek.website 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -38 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Sorry, did I miss something? Boeing took over the FAA? JESUS GOD DAMNED CHRIST!!! WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE!!! Now THAT is news. It has nothing to do with "trying to solve this problem" and pretending it does is just an obnoxious strawman. The issue is coming into a completely unrelated thread to spew some idiocy because your favorite influencer does the same. It is engagement farming for absolutely zero reason. The ONLY mention of Boeing in that article was that they were being considered for a fallback. Which also includes misinformation about NASA deeming it unsafe (as opposed to not as safe/unnecessarily risky when there are safer options). Which.. is an FAA and NASA decision. Because you can bet spacex would gladly fly their rockets if they were allowed to as well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago The issue is coming into a completely unrelated thread to spew some idiocy Good to know you're on the same page as the rest of us regarding whatever it is you're comments have to do with anything. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago It is engagement farming for absolutely zero reason. So what? Should we ban people posting memes too? Should we ban the engagement system/up vote system? Like what's your point here? That people share ideas and thoughts? Wow, what news. The astronauts in space are a big deal and the latest development had SpaceX rescuing them which is why that person brought it up. They weren't bringing up Boeing originally, they were bringing up the astronaut story since it all ties together. If SpaceX is grounded, how will they get those astronauts? And then the next person points out that Boeing and most CEOs tend to feel like worker deaths are the cost of business. That's pretty apropos when talking about those astronauts getting stuck up there. Worker solidarity and all. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago (4 children) You replied to the wrong comment. Or you need to take your meds. Idk which. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) ¿PNLD? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Programa Nacional do Livro e do Material Didático? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No... porque no los dos permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago porque no los dos Ah! Haha yes I agree permalink fedilink source parent [–] mods_mum@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago You missed it by a mile permalink fedilink source parent [+] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] SARGE@startrek.website 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -38 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Sorry, did I miss something? Boeing took over the FAA? JESUS GOD DAMNED CHRIST!!! WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE!!! Now THAT is news. It has nothing to do with "trying to solve this problem" and pretending it does is just an obnoxious strawman. The issue is coming into a completely unrelated thread to spew some idiocy because your favorite influencer does the same. It is engagement farming for absolutely zero reason. The ONLY mention of Boeing in that article was that they were being considered for a fallback. Which also includes misinformation about NASA deeming it unsafe (as opposed to not as safe/unnecessarily risky when there are safer options). Which.. is an FAA and NASA decision. Because you can bet spacex would gladly fly their rockets if they were allowed to as well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago The issue is coming into a completely unrelated thread to spew some idiocy Good to know you're on the same page as the rest of us regarding whatever it is you're comments have to do with anything. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago It is engagement farming for absolutely zero reason. So what? Should we ban people posting memes too? Should we ban the engagement system/up vote system? Like what's your point here? That people share ideas and thoughts? Wow, what news. The astronauts in space are a big deal and the latest development had SpaceX rescuing them which is why that person brought it up. They weren't bringing up Boeing originally, they were bringing up the astronaut story since it all ties together. If SpaceX is grounded, how will they get those astronauts? And then the next person points out that Boeing and most CEOs tend to feel like worker deaths are the cost of business. That's pretty apropos when talking about those astronauts getting stuck up there. Worker solidarity and all. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -38 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Sorry, did I miss something? Boeing took over the FAA? JESUS GOD DAMNED CHRIST!!! WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE!!! Now THAT is news. It has nothing to do with "trying to solve this problem" and pretending it does is just an obnoxious strawman. The issue is coming into a completely unrelated thread to spew some idiocy because your favorite influencer does the same. It is engagement farming for absolutely zero reason. The ONLY mention of Boeing in that article was that they were being considered for a fallback. Which also includes misinformation about NASA deeming it unsafe (as opposed to not as safe/unnecessarily risky when there are safer options). Which.. is an FAA and NASA decision. Because you can bet spacex would gladly fly their rockets if they were allowed to as well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago The issue is coming into a completely unrelated thread to spew some idiocy Good to know you're on the same page as the rest of us regarding whatever it is you're comments have to do with anything. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago It is engagement farming for absolutely zero reason. So what? Should we ban people posting memes too? Should we ban the engagement system/up vote system? Like what's your point here? That people share ideas and thoughts? Wow, what news. The astronauts in space are a big deal and the latest development had SpaceX rescuing them which is why that person brought it up. They weren't bringing up Boeing originally, they were bringing up the astronaut story since it all ties together. If SpaceX is grounded, how will they get those astronauts? And then the next person points out that Boeing and most CEOs tend to feel like worker deaths are the cost of business. That's pretty apropos when talking about those astronauts getting stuck up there. Worker solidarity and all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago The issue is coming into a completely unrelated thread to spew some idiocy Good to know you're on the same page as the rest of us regarding whatever it is you're comments have to do with anything. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago It is engagement farming for absolutely zero reason. So what? Should we ban people posting memes too? Should we ban the engagement system/up vote system? Like what's your point here? That people share ideas and thoughts? Wow, what news. The astronauts in space are a big deal and the latest development had SpaceX rescuing them which is why that person brought it up. They weren't bringing up Boeing originally, they were bringing up the astronaut story since it all ties together. If SpaceX is grounded, how will they get those astronauts? And then the next person points out that Boeing and most CEOs tend to feel like worker deaths are the cost of business. That's pretty apropos when talking about those astronauts getting stuck up there. Worker solidarity and all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago (4 children) You replied to the wrong comment. Or you need to take your meds. Idk which. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) ¿PNLD? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Programa Nacional do Livro e do Material Didático? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No... porque no los dos permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago porque no los dos Ah! Haha yes I agree permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) ¿PNLD? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Programa Nacional do Livro e do Material Didático? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No... porque no los dos permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago porque no los dos Ah! Haha yes I agree permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Programa Nacional do Livro e do Material Didático? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No... porque no los dos permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago porque no los dos Ah! Haha yes I agree permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) No... porque no los dos permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago porque no los dos Ah! Haha yes I agree permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago porque no los dos Ah! Haha yes I agree permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mods_mum@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago You missed it by a mile permalink fedilink source parent
[+] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (6 children) Don't worry, I'm thinking about starting my own rocket company so we can go get them! In our first year, I plan to deploy at least 3 fully functional 1/50th scale prototypes. That's really what sets us apart from the rest. Our commitment to 1/50th scale prototypes. I can't wait, it's going to be pretty sweet! So, the plan is to launch a rocket carrying a thin string. The astronauts will reach out to catch said string. Then, they will pull a strong chain with the string so they can tie the space station to the chain. Then they will slowly climb down until reaching atmosphere. At the point they will jump with a parachute or continue climbing down slowly. It's their choice. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children) This must be that string theory u keep hearing about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is not string theory, this is string practical permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago In theory. But you're right, we're gonna try and try hundreds of millions.... "millions and millions" (of times) as someone smarter than me once said. But by gally (don't know what that means) by gally we'll do it! Even if it doesn't ever work, we'll do it! Because with practice comes.....? permalink fedilink source parent [–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) somewhat relevant xkcd what-if: https://what-if.xkcd.com/157/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago That was phenomenal! 👏 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago Finally the kind of competition that can knock Conksat from it's pedestal! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children) This must be that string theory u keep hearing about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] xavier666@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is not string theory, this is string practical permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago In theory. But you're right, we're gonna try and try hundreds of millions.... "millions and millions" (of times) as someone smarter than me once said. But by gally (don't know what that means) by gally we'll do it! Even if it doesn't ever work, we'll do it! Because with practice comes.....? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) This is not string theory, this is string practical permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago In theory. But you're right, we're gonna try and try hundreds of millions.... "millions and millions" (of times) as someone smarter than me once said. But by gally (don't know what that means) by gally we'll do it! Even if it doesn't ever work, we'll do it! Because with practice comes.....? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago In theory. But you're right, we're gonna try and try hundreds of millions.... "millions and millions" (of times) as someone smarter than me once said. But by gally (don't know what that means) by gally we'll do it! Even if it doesn't ever work, we'll do it! Because with practice comes.....? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) somewhat relevant xkcd what-if: https://what-if.xkcd.com/157/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago That was phenomenal! 👏 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago That was phenomenal! 👏 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago Finally the kind of competition that can knock Conksat from it's pedestal! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 7 points 2 years ago This was a landing failure of a booster after returning from it's mission. Boosters have always been expendable one-and-done parts that would be jettisoned to burn up in the atmosphere. Boeing currently has no roadmap for reusable boosters, meanwhile SpaceX has launched this particular booster 23 times! These booster failures are extremely rare and any booster recovery for any space agency/company that isn't SpaceX is notable. SpaceX is the only agency/company that has recovered and reused a booster, and they've done so hundreds of times. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches#Launch_outcomes Note there was 1 launch failure this year which was their first launch failure since 2016, almost 10 years with hundreds of launches between failures. The last booster to be lost on a landing was in 2023 and not even a booster failure but simply rough seas: First booster to fly for the 19th time. Despite the landing being initially successful, the booster later tipped over during transit due to rough seas, high winds and waves, the stage was unable to be secured to the deck for recovery and later tipped over and was destroyed in transit. SpaceX has already equipped newer Falcon boosters with upgraded landing legs that have the capability to self-level and mitigate this type of issue. So in short, yes it is bad that a booster which shouldn't have been lost was. But in terms of crew safety this isn't a huge concern. SpaceX simply has an incredible track record for successful missions and has become the "safe" bet in aerospace permalink fedilink source parent
[+] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de -9 points 2 years ago (4 children) I'm not sure if I even would want to board a SpaceX at this rate permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (3 children) A booster crash landed, so now you're afraid of the capsule? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) To be fair the booster is an important part permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago Technically almost every booster not made by SpaceX ended up crashlanding. It's just notable that this one wasn't supposed to crashland permalink fedilink source parent [–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago Not for coming down permalink fedilink source parent
[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (3 children) A booster crash landed, so now you're afraid of the capsule? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) To be fair the booster is an important part permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago Technically almost every booster not made by SpaceX ended up crashlanding. It's just notable that this one wasn't supposed to crashland permalink fedilink source parent [–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago Not for coming down permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) To be fair the booster is an important part permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago Technically almost every booster not made by SpaceX ended up crashlanding. It's just notable that this one wasn't supposed to crashland permalink fedilink source parent [–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago Not for coming down permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago Technically almost every booster not made by SpaceX ended up crashlanding. It's just notable that this one wasn't supposed to crashland permalink fedilink source parent