this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
247 points (95.9% liked)
Greentext
4342 readers
1628 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There's a good chance he really was innocent, but being weird around kids like that is enough to tank your career regardless, which is probably for the best.
It's an odd case. Whilst most agree that he wasn't a full blown child rapist, it's clear that he had an interest in young boys that went further than just fantasy, but people choose to ignore it because "BeAt It ThO!!!".
You can appreciate art whilst knowing that the artist was sick.
His father was physically and emotionally abusive to him and his siblings, forcing them to forgo their childhood for fame. He built and lived in an amusement park and would invite kids over to enjoy it. His story reads more like a trauma victim looking to live his missing childhood through others than “a sick artist.”
I agree that his upbringing is an extenuating circumstance and I do believe that caused him to be repressed in many ways, that doesn't mean he didn't act out some fantasies that he had with young boys.
"Sick" is a term that's open to interpretation, some would say that the things he was accused of are sick, others would interpret that he was mentally unwell. I would say it's a bit of both.