THEY RUINED HER, by doing what the original creator intended in 1996.
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
123 points (96.2% liked)
Movies & TV
22878 readers
64 users here now
Rules for Movies & TV Discussion
-
Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.
-
Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.
-
On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.
Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hating women with agency if they don't choose men. It's consistent between 1996 chuds and 2024 chuds.
I wonder if the 1996 dudebro would get upset if the hawt lezbian akkktion they want, male gaze focused and all, actually involved intimacy, tenderness, and a lasting relationship instead of "we have additional sex for you also, senpai" open-ended plausibility for the dudebro watching it.
I think if they hinted at women having agency without men, it would be very poorly received. That is, if it wasn't given an AO rating for pornographic content.
I was there for the 90s, and the sheer tackiness of the everywhere horniness in marketing was laughably bad, even by many modern standards. For example, it wasn't uncommon for video game advertising to not even feature much of the actual game, just horny pictures and edgy remarks about what a loser the potential buyer is (for some reason hating their potential buyers openly was a common marketing strategy back then). CW for nudity in the first picture.
Lara Croft was advertised for the male gaze as much as possible, though her actual characterization was pretty much ignored in such marketing stunts.
You know, g*mers don't appreciate how good they have it these days. I remember that last pic, but I had no idea who Guts was at the time.
I agree with you there.
I was actually put off from actually playing Tomb Raider games in my teenage years because the advertising made me think the games would be simultaneously horny and hostile to me while I played them. "You wanna see my boobs? TOO BAD LOSER BUT KEEP PLAYING!" or some crap like that.
The Lara that actually is and dare I say was was very different than that but I didn't even find out for a long time.
My very first awareness of Final Fantasy 7 was a full page horny picture of Tifa saying "you want a piece of me, big boy?"
I had no idea what the actual game was like; it was just horny because horny sold.
also traumatizing
That top Pic is a game called Forsaken, I remember seeing it at blockbuster and being really curious, cause the box art was that woman's face against that same background with nothing else.
Lol it's actually a 6DOF space shooter
It may have been a decent Descent-like but the marketing was so obnoxiously
that even teenage me was put off by it.
I remember being just confused
im sure any deception of man would be met with criticism. Too effeminate is brainwashing. strong but dumb is demeaning. strong and smart is Chad rolls eyes.
I think if she literally dated Illidan Stormrage it might work for them