https://x.com/votesocialist24/status/1820563500395106496
🚨UPDATE ON BALLOT ACCESS🚨
Over the last few months, volunteers around the country have been actively petitioning, talking with and collecting signatures from tens of thousands of people ready to see a socialist on the ballot in their state.
As of today, our campaign:
- 💥 Is officially on the ballot in 9 states
- 💥 Has submitted the required signatures in 7 states
- 💥 Is still pursuing ballot access in an additional 7 states
- 💥 Is pursuing official write-in status in 22 states
Our campaign has a path to over 270 electoral college votes — a majority.
The two-party system makes it incredibly difficult for third party candidates without huge financial resources to access ballots in some states. No matter what status your state is, we encourage supporters to get involved and help build the movement for a future by and for the people beyond the ballot box!
Whether you can donate your money your time, or both — we need your help! Visit 🔗http://votesocialist2024.com/volunteer to learn how you can get involved!
Good for them 
This "massive attention" is fleeting and far more likely to produce a negative impression than a positive one. I understand they think they're being clever. I'm saying its dumb and is counterproductive and makes them look just like every other bourgeois 3rd party and does in no way
Getting even just one measly school board position to fuck with conservatives to demonstrate that they're actually serious about defending the principles they espouse and not just shouting foreign policy positions people find cringe would generate far more public goodwill than a presidential bid that can't get full 50 ballot access (and even where they do get it they can't even get their party name on the ballot) ever could.
wen ur a srs anti-imperialist
Maybe take one second to actually read about the rationale and tactics of the campaign. One example. We raise a platform position - nationalize the 100 largest corporations, for example - and libs say "that will never happen even if you win, which you won't because the system is stacked against you". We say, "correct - we need a socialist revolution and the only historically proven way to do it is a Marxist-Leninist party".
If you could demonstrate in what way it's "dumb and counterproductive" then you may have a point.
Oh please. A school board member has absolutely no bearing on foreign policy, sacrificing your political capital on performative displays of anti-imperialism will only alienate the people you are trying to get to join and make other potentially sympathetic board members not want to be associated with you or your policies (even if you're just voting in the negative). The people you are trying to reach do not engage with party literature, they hear about PSL from twitter or some local news article which regurgitates whatever the party's take is in the least flattering way possible. Playing into that by using the platform a (very) minor presidential bid gives you is just ... naive at best.
I did. I just disagree.
Why would anyone believe that? Genuinely. Not to mention nationalization isn't even a uniquely socialist policy. The only even nominally socialist state of any significance is China and, at the very least, their economy is as capitalist as apple pie. Promises are cheap. Change people's material conditions for the better and then they will believe you, not before. I understand its hard work and doesn't have the glamour of a protest or a presidential bid, but if we actually want things to change for the better then it must be done.
Are you an anarchist? Wield power before you win it is not a real world plan
You actually made me laugh, thanks. This isn't productive anymore though.