Greentext

4348 readers

1124 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

755

Anon finds a plot hole (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

160 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They do use it to meddle, though, its how the plot in "Prisoner of Azkaban" gets resolved. Also I'm pretty sure that Hermione mentions at one point that people have killed their past selves using time turners, which would not constitute a closed loop of causality.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They do use it to meddle, though, its how the plot in “Prisoner of Azkaban” gets resolved.

They don't violate causality. Everything they do during the time-turner is something that was preordained based on things they saw and did before they activated it. The only surprises are instances of incomplete information they had as characters.

Also I’m pretty sure that Hermione mentions at one point that people have killed their past selves using time turners, which would not constitute a closed loop of causality.

Sure, but that's never really explored beyond a one-liner from a grade school kid.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but that’s never really explored beyond a one-liner from a grade school kid.

I think the implications are explored in "Harry Potter and the cursed child", where causality does get violated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Ah, never bothered with that one.

Edit: looks like it is an "improved version". But also, they do end up resetting everything to the status quo regardless, so... Shrug