99
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

ACs are not being provided to reduce emissions. Most teams seem to be respecting this decision.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No, it's just posturing. The emissions from AC at the Olympic Village would have zero impact on climate change. This is just green washing for public perception points.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

The emissions saved from removing a few hundred ACs are negligible. But the message it sends to the millions watching the Olympics is significant. Which, again, is why I am hoping there will be at least some symbolic action against rule-breakers - it will start a conversation about the need to regulate / ban ACs.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

As far as I can tell, there is no rule to break here.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Lol that's bullshit, someone fucked up to save a dime and they're trying spin it

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

First of all, [citation needed]. Second, even if it is, a good message is being sent.

this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
99 points (98.1% liked)

World News

36511 readers
554 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS