this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
38 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8175 readers
534 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bonus points if the author first mentions a specific trait, physical build, or whatever else halfway through the novel and totally fucks up my mental image.

I don't expect a biology model description for each character, but write me something brief and evocative of how they should look, you fucking dork author. I don't even know how tall she should be, her hair colour, anything. Why are you like this, author?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure older works were very heavy on physical descriptions. And then moving pictures came around, and readers didn't care as much about visual characteristics as they did the plot.

If you read Victorian era stuff, FFS they don't stop describing how things look.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

and readers didn't care as much about visual characteristics as they did the plot.

Por que no los dos?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Older text was more visually descriptive. Dunno what else you'd like, comrade.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

"What I'd like" is probably not good and kinda scary =)