this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
146 points (100.0% liked)

196

17598 readers
567 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What even is this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 86 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

This is the "Lagrangian standard model" - the mathematical formula explaining basically all physics as we know it.

https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/the-deconstructed-standard-model-equation?language_content_entity=und

When you DON'T assume spherical chickens in a vacuum, this is what you gotta calculate.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

assume spherical chickens in a vacuum

lol that’s the next multiverse over, our solution works only with spherical cows in a vacuum.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh man, that' explains it. I've been using spherical swallows, which are roughly coconut sized. So really just use coconut maths.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

lol yfw you realize you coulda just used cubic swallows and called it a day

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Cubic african or european swallows?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Either or works, we're not that precise

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago

The SM is half the puzzle. The other half being Einstein’s field equations (which, despite the beautiful notation, are just as complex). Also, I will note that there are some spherical chickens in this equation as well—like massless neutrinos.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

Well, it's a weightless chicken at least, because this model's got no gravity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Okay, that's actually quite impressive