TechTakes

1430 readers

159 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

656

Remember how ChatGPT totally aced the bar exam? Wow! yeah, turns out that was just a lie (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

252 comments fedilink hide all child comments

archive https://archive.ph/is57b

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 64 points 6 months ago (39 children)

It's more like taking a digital copy into the test room with you and Ctrl+F'ing every question/answer.

[–] bdonvr 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (18 children)

I'm not a big AI guy but it's really not quite like that, models do NOT contain all the data they were trained on.

Edit: I have no idea what's going on down below this comment

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago (11 children)

I’m not a big AI guy

we can tell

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

The guy above you is right though. So what are you on about?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

what a weird opportunity for someone to burn a throwaway account. not even gonna dig into what you’ve imagined the other guy is right about, given he didn’t post any information of value

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Lemmy is starting to have a huge problem with people creating multiple sockpuppets--probably programmatically generating them, in fact--just to win internet arguments. If this goes on too long you're going to see a really surprising number of sudden downvotes on everything you've said in this conversation, and anyone who agreed with you.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It’ll actually be good if that happens because 1) it could be dealt with here, 2) that could be used to feed something that helps defend against it

(e: I mean, it’ll be a nuisance, and @self would be driven to drink, but it could still be handled)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

we already ignore offsite downvotes

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

aha, good to know too :D

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I truly wish those so inclined good luck with the downvotes and with coordinating their sockpuppets in a way that isn’t extremely fucking obvious