this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
170 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3612 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 months ago (13 children)

Even if they were willing, physically moving 20 million people is a huge undertaking that the US really does not have the ability to do. Not only would the cost be outrageous, but coordinating it in 50 states would be an infrastructure nightmare. Now imagine if 25% of them flat out refuse. What are we going to do, shoot them? I really don’t think genocide on home turf will go over well.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 months ago

The most important bit about this isn't how it'll be done. It's to convince people that a certain group of people is the cause of all of their problems.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

Republicans would cheer a domestic genocide.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What are we going to do, shoot them?

Yes.

I really don’t think genocide on home turf will go over well.

See above.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

What are we going to do, shoot them?

Ya. Probably. It’s Trump and his goon’s wet dream. That’s why this is scary.

All this rhetoric does is brazen his fans.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

And fuck my neighbors (cops who support Trump) when they come for my neighbors (I don't ask questions, but they aren't white and they're a thousand times better people than the cop family).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

He and his Republican allies know it's not a workable plan. Which is why they'll compromise, using more efficient methods of removing these people as well as their political enemies.

Ovens are cheap.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

As for the cost, we have no problem throwing money at humiliating and dehumanizing people. It's fucking outrageous. There's plenty of examples where we pay lots more money to hurt people instead of help them.

We will find a way to pay for it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Just think of all the jobs this would create, tho! And if you remove 10% of workers then wages will rise! Just think of it like the construction of the interstate highway system during The Great Depression.

But seriously, can we just put all this fervor and effort into repairing bridges, roads, and railways?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Bring back the WPA.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Wages won’t rise. They’ll just give everyone more work to pick up the slack and blame them for not meeting quota so they don’t have to give raises.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

These days public-/cargo transportation is far more available and more efficient than it was in 1940 ...

Besides that, Trump has a huge, well armed, following ("militia") that will start frothing at the mouth if they see a "designated deportee" walking in their area.... (For a fun comparison I say go watch the Alabama Top Gear episode from series 9 on YouTube)

And that same following feels it has a Carte Blanche to do whatever as long as they think it supports the orange overlord.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

The militia is not huge. It’s tiny. They are fat and unhealthy and untrained.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I’d assume the goal is too leave the what if open ended so the “officer” can decide.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Listen we could build giant freeways into Mexico. Hell even like a train that would run 24/7. It would tunnel right through the "wall". How could this plan go wrong? 😂

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

What are we going to do, shoot them?

Yes, I'm sure that would be something magoos that have been effectively made into death squads would be DELIGHTED to do.

I really don’t think genocide on home turf will go over well.

Again, the magoos have been stroking themselves over this for DECADES. It will be something that makes them rock hard.