World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Wow. Two stories in one day about how America brought freedom to Iraq.
It's America's fault because Bush invaded to "bring freedom" to Iraq and then America stayed there for seven years and this is the result a decade later. And you think America should still be occupying Iraq? Should it be annexed as the 51st state or something?
You realize that by reducing all political activity in Iraq to the invasion of Iraq, you are posing the Iraqi people as puppets with no will of their own?
So that I don't repeat myself, see this reply: https://lemmy.world/comment/9699031
Homosexuality was legal in Iraq while Saddam was in power.
Edit: re your edit-
No, but I am saying their will isn't being represented. Because it isn't.
https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/10/iraqi-elections-still-do-not-deliver-democracy
Queers? I don't know. Women? Because I do know.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_Iraq
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Iraq
So I don't know for sure if queer people's lives would have been better, but at least they wouldn't have been automatic criminals.
See above: re Satayana.
Yes, I quoted that part. It came after the part I bolded that said "In the years following the 1991 Gulf War," which makes me think you didn't actually read much of it.
The 1991 Gulf War was when the U.S. invaded Iraq the first time. It was, again, America's fault.
1990? You mean when America started threatening to Invade and Saddam sought the aid of the fundamentalists to stay in power, going against his own party?
Yes, I agree, Saddam was a terrible dictator.
That doesn't change the fact that homosexuality was legal when he was in charge and illegal now.
And I re-iterate my previous point that it wouldn't have happened anyway if America hadn't stuck its nose in.
Saddam didn't reach out to the Islamists while at war with Iran. He certainly could have.
I'd trade Iraq for Texas. They have more oil and probably less genocidal bigots, even in light of this news.
At least you can talk Iraqis down from the death penalty.
They were a shithole before we invaded and they are still a shithole. We didn't bomb homophobia into the country.
And yet, homosexuality was legal then and it's illegal now. Seems like a big difference to me.
Iraq was a secular country with the best healthcare in the region. The US war made electricity and water no longer available 24/7 and allowed a wave of fundamentalism in. Pretending it was broken before the war is ignorance.
Must be time to bomb them back into compliance with western values.
The sad thing is a significant chunk of Lemmy seems to have either forgotten America's role in shaping Iraq into the way it is today or aren't aware of it at all. Satayana would be shaking his head.
whoosh
Do please tell me what I'm missing. Is the person I was replying to who I was essentially agreeing with also missing the same thing?
Your original reply seemed like you were talking about the comment, not agreeing with it
Just to be clear I was joking. I don’t want to bomb anyone ever.
Yeah, and the other commenter got it, but the other other one thought that that other commenter thought you were serious. But the other other commenter was wrong; that other commenter knew you were joking. And so did I.
Man, this is getting confusing. But everyone understood your comment, at least! Lol
Well I was wrong about someone else being wrong but I think you're about who was wrong or right. Am I right?
No, I think we're both wrong to the right.
Three rights make a left.
Iran has been shaping them into what they are now though.
Iran didn't "guide" them into creating a constitution that was deferential to Islam. In fact, the Ba'ath party, which was gotten rid of when Saddam was defeated, was secular. It was the U.S. that did that.
Bombing isn't really in the Iraq playbook yet.
Maybe it can be added after the latest section on insurrection sand we'll see about next time.