this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2024
825 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3933 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • A Seattle basic income pilot gave low-income residents $500 a month, nearly doubling employment rates.
  • Some participants reported getting new housing, while others saw their employment incomes rise.
  • Basic income pilots nationwide have seen noteworthy success, despite conservative opposition.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 180 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The 10,000th study to show the same result. Probably need to do a hundred thousand more.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 6 months ago

bUt jUsT giViNg pEopLe mOnEy WiLL mAkE ThEm LazY!!!

[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It would be good to know how this works on a larger scale. Like, everyone in a city or county having UBI and watching to see what society and the local economy as a whole does in response.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It would be wise to test it everywhere. Just on a trial basis...Indefinitely.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Sure. Until landlords realize they can raise their rent without losing tenants. Or insurance companies. Or grocery distributors. I doubt this works without other laws and policies needing to go into effect beforehand.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

That's why UBI needs to be combined with common sense price ceilings. When you do that, it WILL work as intended.

I doubt this works without other laws and policies needing to go into effect beforehand

Or just simultaneously. Here's a snazzy name I had an LLM come up with for the bill name:

FAIR-CARE: Fair Allocation of Income Resources - Common-sense Affordable Regulation for Everyone

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

Sounds like we need to break some monopolies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

These are the unanswered questions. This example is 102 people out of an overall city population of 750,000. The biggest question about UBI has been "so what happens if you try to scale it to a significant portion of the population", but no one has dared really try.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

This was a joke comment, but I did a genuine one here https://lemmy.world/comment/9541394

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Look at the stimulus checks and how they measurable gains up and down the economy and living conditions.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Check out Kenya, they have the largest and longest running experiment.