this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
440 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3894 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 71 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

I thought they were already moving to have it thrown out and start seizure proceedings last week? What's taking so long?

[–] [email protected] 55 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Letitia James challenged the validity of the bond roughly two weeks ago.

The challenge does not harm Trump’s bond but makes it so that the insurance company will need to show proof that they can pay it. 

Trump's lawyers responded last week.

Now she is preparing to argue before a judge that their response is inadequate.

The hearing will be on Monday.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is he reauired to attend this one as well?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No, he is only required to attend criminal trials.

The appeal bond is part of a civil case, not criminal. And appeals are not trials, so attendance is not required.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Stalling tactics to find more money?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well, I mean...they've committed fraud at this point by submitting a false bond to the court. I don't see how they could stall at all.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

they've committed fraud at this point

Not quite. At this point Letitia James is arguing that the bond is no good, but a judge hasn't yet ruled on whether she is right.

If and when that happens, there will be less room to stall.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It worked! Should have been seizing property weeks ago. But they still haven’t.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah, and now they're tied up in procedural red tape.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Nah, just the usual incompetence and fraud.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

To hide more money, but yeah, stalling.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

It's court. A week or two is not a long time.