Doubt it. Why would a maintainer intentionally self sabotage their own API stability? Cutting off one's nose to spite the face.
He's also stealing our tax dollars through government contracts. Trump does the same thing.
When I said that weed isn't harmless. I didn't say it should be criminal. I just don't like people pretending it has no downsides.
Why is it in a spoon? 🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄🥄
It's the Lagrangian of the standard model of particle physics
This is so perfect. Like after all these years someone decided to overanalyze Goldilocks.
I literally didn't even boot Windows for a month and then when I did, I got BSOD on boot, and it gave me some bullshit about not being able to find a device. How's that for maintenance? I can't say I miss it.
Do you really discard errors this often? I would say almost all of my Result
s get propagated to the caller via ?
and handled in one place near the start of the stack.
And a lot more bug prone. I'm just explaining the OP because people didn't get it. I'm not saying dynamic languages are bad. I'm saying they have different trade-offs.
Helix. Instant startup. Minimal configuration required. Has all of the killer features I want from an IDE anyway.
EDIT: I assumed people would just research this anyway, but a more complete list of features I enjoy from Helix:
- very responsive
- modal editing
- declarative configuration file format (TOML, not Lua)
- language server protocol
- debug adapter protocol
- written in Rust so I am more likely to be able to submit a PR if I need to
Some cons (all known issues on github):
- no plugin API yet
- inline LSP diagnostics are overly intrusive and can overlap your code
- cold-starts the LSP when you start the editor, so you might need to wait for symbol queries in a large project
Honestly even tech workers are not paid enough relative to executives. Shit is crazy out here.
And then lawyers be making like $1mil a year.
tatterdemalion
0 post score0 comment score
Just another example of politicians having no idea how technology and security work. Not only that, but willfully disregarding warnings from experts.