You also keep blatantly ignoring the points that refute your strawmen, because you know you can't defend your position.

No one said anything about speeding, crossing the road, or anything of that nature.

The entire discussion is about how walking in the road and not being easily visible is dangerous and stupid. That's it. Full stop.

And you are deliberately ignoring everything I've said, such as my explanation of what I meant when I said 'speeding'. I've made myself clear that I am talking about people crossing the road, as there very fewother reasons for people to be in the road, and I don't believe that there are swarms of people just walking in the middle of the road for no reason.

There is no strawman, because the basis of your argument is that people need to make themselves more visible to avoid being hit by cars. The vast majority of accidents, however, occur due to: distracted or inebriated drivers; or drivers driving too fast for the road conditions. Pedestrians will never be visible enough to prevent these accidents, yet you seem to think that the solution to reducing pedestrian accidents is 'more visibility'.

Why am I not allowed to cross the road?

When there is no social safety net, and you need money to live you can't afford to be picky.

Yeah, guaranteed I would be the first 🤣

Thanks.

Thanks for this!

Like I said, it's a shame there's no way to avoid playing into 'their' hands and giving them all that extra revenue.

Wait, there are other protocols?

You are correct, and the outcome of the hearing won't be known for a couple of years. However indications are that the PL is basing their charges on the Der Speigle documents (out of context, doctored emails stolen from MCFC and released by a convicteded fraudster and blackmailer). UEFA based their case on the same emails, and the CAS (European sporting appeal court) found that there was no veracity to them and no evidence of any wrong doing on MCFCs part, apart from non cooperation with UEFAs 'investigation'.

No they're not! They have the highest revenue in world football, and have one of the lowest 'net spends' (as useless as that metric is) of all the 'major teams' over the last 5 yrs. They are nowhere near failing FFP!

Gdpr relates to data that can be used to identify you. Your username and content associated with it is not identifiable,so they are free to share it. Plus you agree to the sharing of that data when you sign up. Anything thst explicity ties your username to identifiable information such as email, ip, other usernames etc is controlled by Gdpr.

The goal short term isn't to be profitable though. The goal is to pull enough users so they can effectively stunt the growth of 'competition'.