static

So you identified a problem.
But complaining does not fix anything, How can we combat toxic behaviour and make this place good?

So you identified a problem.
But complaining does not fix anything, How can we combat toxic behaviour and make this place good?

Met kbin een beetje, maar ik denk niet dat ze dat in de komende 6 maanden verbeteren. daarna wel

You do not, awards do not propogate to other servers.

I'm anti awards and status. donations on feel good works good enough to cover the expenses.

If it's a real instance? No problem, deal with it!

In the futute I expect there would be spam instances with fake upvotes, yes those should be banned.

And even then there could be donated vs award servers.
I prefer to focus on the donated ones.

It was a bit mean/dishonest from me to frame costs for you.
my guess of dounations just does not match yours.

So when scaling up

You expect that : costs per user rise and donations per user drop?

I expect that: costs per user drop, donations per user stay the same, and external subsidies rise.

Not at this stage.
Lemmy grew too fast, got many more eyes.
Step 1 is getting a security focus group selected from the people who contribute code to lemmy.

Just like the admins and coders volonteer their time, security specialists will too, money might be needed, but that is not in the the first steps.

This is just getting too big too fast.

Lots of things change when you grow too fast, one of them is that any stupid failure will be found and exploited.
The project will mature and get a better security process, that has nothing to do with politics.

I would like to see some numbers first. Donations work fine for mastodon.

Edit : here are mastodon.world financials https://blog.mastodon.world/