Dude is just advocating for keynesianism.
Years ago I wrote here using an alt about how I had yelled in public at one of my chud neighbors because he put a trump sign on his lawn. I stalked him later on facebook (which I no longer use) and saw his writing about the encounter. I could barely understand what he was even talking about. This is a white boomer who works as a school bus driver. Becoming a school bus driver now is super hard actually, it requires six months of full-time training/education where I live, but I suspect that he got into school bus driving before all of that, because his writing looked almost like he had just smashed his keyboard with his hands. No punctuation, many spelling and grammatical mistakes. I remember he wrote "I'm" when he should have written "I am"—it was something like: "He doesn't know how nice of a guy I am," but he wrote it "He doesn't know how nice of a guy I'm." This guy also speaks with a heavy accent and only in short, simple sentences. I've worked as an ESL teacher for years, and I tell students now—many of them are perfectionists—that they already speak English better than some native speakers.
I don't know what level his literacy is at. I guess he is barely capable of communicating in writing and also able to sign and cash checks and buy things at the grocery store?
Another story: I work in a blue collar field which requires us to enter about four houses each day. 95% of houses have absolutely no books at all. Of the remaining 5% of houses with books, the vast majority are only bibles and cookbooks. 1% has books that are mostly for decoration. Another 1% or so has books that appear to have been read. I have only found a handful of houses with communist texts. Most of the houses with books that seem to have been read are just filled with liberal nonsense. (One Mormon landlord I met, who owned so many houses I think he was confused about the number, had dozens of Mormon-themed books in his basement, including even one book about overcoming doubt about Mormonism.) A coworker and I once entered the very rare American house that seemed to have hundreds of books. My coworker (white, in his thirties, has a high school education at best) didn't even notice them. I guess I just found this stunning. I was fascinated with the books' existence and wanted to examine them all, even if they were almost certainly all liberal nonsense (the owners were retired academics, one book I remember seeing there was something like "Hitler and Stalin"), but my coworker was still just glued to tiktok on his phone (and not communist tiktok). He's actually an okay guy. He so desperately wants to be a normal American, but he has two trans kids whom he seems to love, so it's basically impossible for him to be as reactionary as he would like to be. I talked with him for about a hundred hours when we worked together, never revealing that I was a communist and always avoiding obvious Marxist language, and only made modest progress at best. When we finished working together a few months ago, he had expressed interest in voting for RFK. He had also never heard of long covid and seemed to be concerned about it when I mentioned it. Then he went back to normal. As for me, I have trouble watching videos to learn things because they're just too slow, sometimes even if I set them at double speed. I prefer reading, although I do listen to a lot of books and podcasts, although I'm usually listening while I'm doing something else. Not to denigrate learning from videos since I know they can be useful and some people really get a lot out of them (especially when it comes to learning blue collar shit), but in my opinion, a random book is going to have a lot more information than a random youtube video.
A lot of the Ivy grad pmc centrists don't know shit about shit, they just know the style choices, catchphrases, and speaking cadences that will get them clocked as thoughtful and competent by the layperson, while letting them ward off questions from smart people that actually probe their depth of knowledge.
See: Disciplined Minds by Jeff Schmidt
leonard leo fuming rn
The choice is simple.
Biden wins and you can have genocide.
Trump wins and you can also have genocide.
Wow, this is incredibly inspiring. Please direct me to the polls right now!
edit: Also, the USA has never been a democracy. Project 2025, more like Project 1492, am I right?
also edit: if I were president, and the SCOTUS just declared that I am an emperor immune to all prosecution, I would simply imprison my political opponents (plus all landlords and business owners and police officers and soldiers, except those vouched for by workers), I would free everyone currently in prison, establish universal health care, education, and housing, forgive all debt, close all military bases, withdraw the US military from around the planet, return all indigenous land and sovereignty to indigenous people, expropriate all millionaires and billionaires and use their stolen money to pay the current value of forty acres and a mule plus interest to all descendants of slaves (and also pay reparations to every country harmed by the USA (so, every country outside the western bloc)), connect the country with a national bullet train network, dismantle all nuclear weapons, reintroduce covid precautions (deporting to europe anyone who even raises an eyebrow in response), nationalize all corporate and social media and use it to relentlessly bombard the populace with Marxist history and amerikkka bad communist propaganda 24/7, and, as my final act, pull down the American flag that's on top of the White House and declare that the USA has been dissolved and no longer exists
I think it also has something to do with the bourgeoisie wanting an escape from bourgeois problems. This is one reason why stories like Game of Thrones or even Dune (space feudalism) are so popular. Capitalist class struggle infuriates the bourgeoisie, since they are so obviously the bad guys, which means that they prefer to escape to simpler times, when the bourgeoisie was the underdog, and the evil, petty, but entertaining feudal ruling class was running things.
I recommend an obscure, fun, bonkers SF novel called The Killing Star, which features accelerating metal slugs to 90% c before flinging them into planets. There's also a chapter that takes place on the Titanic. And TNG makes an appearance toward the end. Supposedly the ships in this novel inspired the interstellar vehicles we see in the Avatar movies. There's also an earlier book in this series which features wooden spaceships piloted by kangaroos (though it's all hard SF, I assure you!).
Feel like I should post a link to the first chapter of my fantasy novel, Byzantine Wars, which defies all or nearly all of these annoying tropes. You can read the whole thing there for free, although that website is kind of not my favorite. I can also just send an epub to those who message me. All I ask is that if you like it, please share it with other people who might be interested. The story is basically Jumanji in Byzantium, plus slave revolt, with a magic system mostly inspired by Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon.
The tropes I countered were:
- chosen one(s): peasants and workers are the heroes, people can only change things by working together in the name of universal human liberation (the "bad guys" can only fight them by acting like vampires); it's not good versus evil, it's imperialists versus workers; anyone can learn how to use magic;
- the only people who care about bloodlines are imperialists;
- good characters look like shit, bad characters are beautiful;
- Many different cultures are represented here, with many different characters belonging to one culture or another; there are many good and bad Greeks, Muslims, Jews, etcetera, along with plenty of Kurds, Iranians, Africans, Arabs, Armenians, Roma, Assyrians, Turks, Georgians, and more!
- the story is about the Roman Empire versus a slave republic; the Roman government is generally depicted negatively, but most Romans support it; the slave republic is generally depicted positively, though its leaders and people argue with each other and question one another;
- the slaves aren't afraid to do violence against Romans and rarely hesitate to use their own weapons against them;
- I'm super annoyed at how the most popular fantasy series (Game of Thrones, Lord of the Rings, even Harry Potter) just ignore economics almost completely. We see cities that consist of a castle, and that's it. How do these people get their food? Where are their farms? So I definitely paid a lot more attention to this, but worked it into the story. I'm not a fan of writers like KSR interrupting their stories with miniature magazine articles.
- the series mostly takes place in what is now Turkey, Georgia, and the Middle East.
- honestly I like how GRRM includes disabled people in his work (even if he sucks in many other ways) so that was one thing I went for;
- no SA or very little SA;
- the barbarians are more civilized than the Romans;
- women can be horny but are not just objects of lust;
- four main characters: two good ones, one "morally gray" one (sorry), one bad one;
- plenty of trans people (redditors call this "presentism": CW transphobia but
);
spoiler
didn't you know that trans people never existed until a few years ago and anyone writing about trans people is just inserting George Soros's woke agenda to virtue signal about how pure and good they are unlike me, a redditor who readily admits that he is scum?
For a lot of fun, google "covid" + "[virtually any disease]" in order to find out how covid is basically airborne any disease:
I struggled with this as a writer because I had, for decades, wanted to write a fantasy epic, yet after becoming a communist it became extremely obvious to me that nearly all, if not all fantasy and science fiction is reactionary. The genre itself is the problem, because it basically functions as a way for white guys to escape from real world problems (i.e., the world's teeming masses are getting stronger and cannot be stopped).
Even relatively leftwing SFF (Star Trek, Star Wars) is so often unclear about where it stands, politically, that it appeals to reactionaries. One has to dig to realize that Luke is supposed to be with the Viet Cong; Star Trek is basically Horatio Hornblower in space, and spends maybe a total of five minutes (across hundreds of hours of TV and cinema) talking about about socialism (except for DS9). Just a few days ago I told a coworker who liked Episode One that it might be the most racist movie ever made; he had no idea about the Gungans being caricatures of Jamaicans, the Neimoidians being Japanese caricatures, and Watto being a caricature of basically every different race that lives around the Mediterranean, although to my coworker's credit he didn't argue with me when I told him. A small amount of less-famous SFF is a little clearer about where it stands; liberals like Octavia Butler and Ursula K. Le Guin, but fascists don't (as far as I know).
I needed to figure out if there would be fantasy races in my trilogy, and I decided pretty quickly that there wouldn't be. I would throw in some interesting monsters, but that would be it. As for fantasy powers, they would be like Crouching Tiger, but democratized. Anyone who wanted to could learn them, and to avoid the liberal obsession with individualism, they would be based largely on solidarity (with the bad guys using magic like vampires—in order to prey on people).
Fantasy races basically function (as the amazing Graeber quote ITT shows) as an excuse for people to be racist. Tolkien's orcs are basically the Nazi vision of African oriental working class Judeo-Bolsheviks. The Eye of Sauron is Big Brother / the Panopticon / the superego. Rather than in a caricatured form of Europe, my fantasy trilogy would take place in a real historical place (11th century Byzantium) with real historical groups of people (Greeks, Armenians, Turks, Jews, Persians, Assyrians, Arabs, Laz, Georgians, Varangians, Normans, Venetians, and more!) fighting over land many of them have inhabited for centuries if not millennia. This would get sticky and complicated, but I would do my best to do justice to these different groups and keep them human (not idealized) but also entertaining. I wouldn't clothe them in head crests like Star Trek does (much as I love Star Trek) so that I could turn them into easy caricatures and then make fun of them.
That project is finished, and I'm currently posting it chapter-by-chapter here. Eventually it'll be released in paper / ebook form. I've been thinking a lot about releasing it on hexbear to see if anyone likes it (there is a chapter midway through the first book that involves throwing landlords out of their mansions, and two main characters are trans, so there's a lot of hexbear bait, basically).
I'm currently writing a StarCraft fan-fiction, but with all the names and a number of concepts changed, and the racism that is inherent to SFF has come up once again, because StarCraft is fundamentally about three races with inherent strengths and weaknesses battling each other in the Korprulu Sector (the word means something like "bridge" in Turkish). If you look carefully at the OG StarCraft storyline, there is so much weird liberal fascist shit it is fucking unreal (the trope about the revolutionary leader betraying his own followers, the communist-like Zerg only being interested in slavery, genocide, and eugenics (the infested marine is literally a brainwashed suicide bomber), the Protoss basically fighting for landback on Aiur but never really having the strength to pull it off even though they're supposed to be super advanced and powerful, every cinematic involving Terrans basically being about white dudes with southern accents getting brutally killed, and on and on and on...).
All of this ultimately comes down to a dialectical contradiction: everything is similar yet different at the same time.
Sometimes I think Graeber is overrated but this is brilliant.
spacecorps_writer
0 post score0 comment score
I find it helps a lot to plan. Try to figure your story out before you begin. You can always change your plans later.
For me, writing early in the morning with coffee and trance-inducing music makes things much easier. Lock yourself out of the internet, put your phone in a place that's difficult to get to.
Publish your work. There's no such thing as objective feedback. Everyone has some kind of bias. People who actually spend money on your work want to like it, otherwise they feel like chumps. In my experience, writers and editors criticize a lot more than general readers. When I read really popular and successful novels, I can't believe how lazy they are, for lack of a better word (although many of them are still entertaining). A lot of successful writers seemingly barely edit their work at all (they go through it once or twice), while writing teachers will insist that you spend ten years driving yourself insane "honing" a piece of fiction that has a 99% chance of going absolutely nowhere, not because of your skill, but simply because thousands of books and stories are published every second, and how many of them achieve any kind of prominence? Write quickly. Crank your shit out, publish it, learn what you can, and move on to the next project. Take down ideas for projects so you always have something to work on. These days because of my job I can usually only crank out a few pages a day. This still results in me publishing about two books per year.
Politics is essential to writing. Show, don't tell is CIA bullshit. There's plenty of liberal and fascist slop out there, but not a lot of communist slop, especially in English. A lot of the communist fiction that exists is also depressing or defeatist. I try to be subtle about the politics in my writing, but I find that people still easily figure it out. There's no fooling them. I feel like a lot of readers can sense that there is something different about my work, but they can't even put their finger on it because they've never encountered the dialectical materialist style. The ideological realm is another front of class struggle.
The rule with reviewers is that if they all mention one specific issue with your story, then it's probably a problem. But if liberals are complaining about the communism in your story, does that mean your communism is a problem? (No, fuck 'em.) The reviewers that truly drive me crazy are the ones who hate your story only because of its politics, but pretend that other issues, always vaguely described, are the real problem.
It's pretty normal to dislike your work when you look back on it. Hopefully this is because we are constantly growing as writers. It makes me nuts when people tell me they like my older books rather than my newer ones. (I think this is common for lots of artists of all kinds.) Are we actually improving, or do we just desperately want to believe that we are improving?