My best breakups have been when I didn't wait for the best or right time to break up. Because once you are there, even if you wait, you know it's never going to be the right time; it will only fester and fester until your entirety is gradually dragged into an existential sepsis.

That's absurd coming from the founder of a FOSS messaging app who actively decided not to let Signal federate and rejected any other open source Signal client. Not only that, even now you can't truly use Signal's new "username" feature. If any of the recipients have your number stored in their phonebook, irrespective of whether you know them or not, the username goes for a toss. This was/is the problem with Telegram's username feature. Signal knew this and still decided to go ahead with it. Not to mention never doing anything about completely removing the phone number from the account after its creation. This has been, by design, a privacy and hence safety threat, and even after the username feature was implemented, this not getting implemented is very concerning.

A lot of these "privacy sensitive" service providers are actually quite user-hostile.

Find a middle ground - get your own domain (pick a good registrar) and find a respectable mail host that has a support team with accountability who don't treat you like a burden on this planet when you attempt to contact them (i.e not Tuta, not Mailbox-org - nope!!!, not Proton etc.). Do not go overboard with DMARC/etc in the beginning. Go about it slowly.

Also - make sure you use a service that lets you connect via an IMAP/POP client. It pains me to say that, but if you start avoiding services based on "five eyes" and "14 eyes" and "195 eyes", I'm pretty sure we will be looking at pigeons and corked bottles in the sea. So, if you need E2EE over email - please use E2EE in the email using GPG on your own. I'd highly recommend not falling for the privacy theatre of the likes of Proton.

• By forcing you to use a non-anonymous Google Account.
• Then tying it with Google Play Services on that device.
• Google Play Services are like a combo of arteries and nerves of Android OS.

That's how.

That's the opposite of minimalism, I'd argue. I would consider minimalism as: having less, keeping/retaining less, and also, and in my opinion – more important, doing less.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7CW7S0zxv4 this is just an example as he is kinda famous. But you can find more. Here's two seasoned journos talking https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4682YUnN_yQ and this https://www.youtube.com/shorts/TXokRjBVSaA (I don't like this journo to be honest but it's another example of very common Indian accent - hers is actually less sophisticated as the previous ones have had kinda more "private school" upbringing).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ha-LoNqOaEk few examples of subcontinent English

It is actually nice when the person has better language proficiency in English. What people often make fun of on the Internet are many who either don't know how to speak English or don't know it well, and that's pretty common and normal for that country of 1.5 billion. If you listen to any seasoned Indian journalist (especially a bit older), you'd hear that faint old English lilt (from the middle of the start of the last century). You will also find that in the way Pakistanis speak English. It's very similar.

I like most or all of them when the speaker has at least above-average proficiency. Except American. Esp. the one that rolls a lot and for long (probably from the South of the USA, I am not sure). That's what makes it very hard for me to watch/hear most of the American content.

My favourite, though, is from my home country, which has a very slight tinge of (old) British accent (colonial leftover/hangover) and also the Middle Eastern accent (it's close to home), again only if the speaker has very good proficiency.

The thing is most of my gold (i.e. ~20% of my portfolio) is as ETFs. Good luck to me using that when civilisation collapses, if it does (I don't think that's happening in the shape and form as it sounds from this article). But then it was not likely at all I would be able to safeguard that in the physical gold form either in that perceived atmosphere of tyranny and mayhem, so that's there.

One could, however, look to reduce or balance (whatever you wanna call it) USD exposure.

This is relevant for immigrants who are trying to escape poverty, almost with no future in their own countries either for their personal or professional aspirations. I am not a China fan, but when you look at countries around the world, many of which are very poor and underdeveloped but with lots of brilliant, hard-working people with dreams and potential, they would rather go to a place where they have at least some stability, predicted living and working conditions, and a future, rather than to a place where one doesn't know whether the potential future mayor of New York City, born and brought up in the USA and hence of course a citizen who happens to be the son of a world-famous filmmaker and a well-known academic, will actually be deported or not. I mean that's a real possibility at this point - let that sink in. (I am not even going for more extreme examples)

I wish things were better, and I wish we didn't live in a world where China, yes, China – of all the countries, might become a viable alternative for people from the developing or underdeveloped world compared to the USA.

The thing is that 10 min search results in - trust all of them, trust none of them. A lot of folks also have affordability issues. So that makes this issue even more complex. When they turn a bit more "respected" forums they are told to "self host" or are given recommendations that they already knew of but couldn't afford. So the problem lives on. All this lead to shady and heavy marketing VPNs come to the front.

With the phone number, no; and since there's no Signal usage without a phone number, well…. Also, I think somewhere on their website (or some place) they talked about burner phones as if it's a universal phenomena.

Signal has felt "out of place" to me. Odd. It doesn't fit in, doesn't make sense if I think a bit farther about it.

I hope something decentralised comes out of Signal protocol minus the need for a phone number.