salamandermander

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 75 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

This is literally how the soviet union suppressed dissent in the 80s. Disagreement with the party was legally considered a sign of psychological issues. They did this to replace the gulags.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

It's incredibly common tankie propaganda to depict Russia as somehow returning to, and defending, a modern form of socialism. Which many tankies eat up eagerly since the modern Russian state descends from the Soviet one, and Russia was (up until 2 months ago) the largest enemy of western capitalist/liberal democracies.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

Wasn't Scott Ritter a pedophile???? Who the hell thinks taking his word on foreign policy is smart when the man is that evil?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago

Arguably the air force was also just too scared of flying wings to give them the development they needed rather than the tech being unsolvable at the time. It's a shame that none of the prototypes were preserved

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Is this about Costco?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's already a thing it's called homeopathic medicine

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In my sleep addled vision the words "protests" and "states" became "prostates" like damn 50 of them??

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I hardly even know her

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is this fucking loss

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Actually I take it back I don't like your metaphor. It would be accurate if the industrial and technical requirements between 5th and 6th gen aircraft were as different as that of a horse and buggy, but fundamentally that's not the case.

Both call for stealth technology, advanced integrated avionics, high performance gas turbines, composite material and titanium structures to meet strength/weight requirements, and advanced radar/sensors, all combined in a package that is both reliable and can be manufactured em mass.

The US has been demonstrating those capabilities for 30 years. China has obtained some of them (still lags in engine, avionics capabilities, and radar) and has only been able to manufacture aircraft with them at a fraction of the scale.

The Chinese aircraft industry is suddenly going to leapfrog the US on all of those features AND manufacture them on a great scale? I doubt that.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

I like your metaphor, horse and buggies lol Again I still disagree with you. If we extend the metaphor, let's say 6th gen is a model T car from the 1900s.

The US has Next Generation Air Defense (NGAD) motorcar in development to replace the "horse and buggy" F-22 as a dedicated air supremacy buggy. We also have the B-21 Raider (more like a whole ass truck in this metaphor) rolling out now which is a bomber that's more advanced than either the F-35 "buggy" or the flying triangle "motorcar" that china has a prototype of and which nobody knows anything about performance-wise other than that it's triangular and can fly.

Also the one model of horse and buggy china has is still inferior to the far older F-22 that the US has had since the 1990s.

Something tells me that China isn't going to outpace the US in either production numbers or technical capabilities of aircraft.

view more: next ›