7
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by redfox@infosec.pub to c/indiana@midwest.social

HB 1343 has a section that slips in a possibly dangerous ability for the governor to use a military police entity within the national guard as he wishes, without much checks and balances. See below, it's now in section/chapter 23.

This seems like a bad idea.

Note, the governor can already call members of the National Guard to state active duty orders, and there's already a military police unit under 81st Troop Command, but it's more limited and they generally are still not police for a civilian population like most people think of. LLM explained it well for those who don't know:

  1. The "Emergency" Loophole

Current Law: Generally, for the Guard to be used in a law enforcement capacity, the Governor declares a State of Emergency. This declaration is usually tied to a specific event (tornado, pandemic, civil unrest) and has time limits and legislative oversight.

Under HB 1343: The bill allows deployment "at any other time the governor considers necessary."

Implication - This effectively removes the requirement for a formal "Emergency" or "Disaster" declaration to use military police. The Governor could theoretically deploy this force to patrol a city for "crime suppression" without ever declaring an emergency or citing a specific disaster.

This is also a good way to think about it:

"Martial Law Lite": HB 1343 allows the Governor to use military personnel to police civilians without the political and legal fallout of declaring Martial Law. The courts remain open, and civil law remains in effect, but the enforcers are soldiers answering directly to the Governor, not local police chiefs or sheriffs answering to voters.


Here's the full text of the section, buried within the rest of the bill.

https://iga.in.gov/pdf-documents/124/2026/house/bills/HB1343/HB1343.04.ENGH.pdf

Chapter 23. Military Police Force of the Indiana National 29 Guard 30 Sec. 1. The adjutant general may establish a military police 31 force of the Indiana National Guard. 32 Sec. 2. (a) Before granting police powers to an individual 33 appointed as a member of the military police force of the Indiana 34 National Guard, the adjutant general shall validate that the 35 individual has a current security clearance and has not been 36 convicted of a felony. 37 (b) An individual appointed to serve in the military police force 38 of the Indiana National Guard may not exercise police powers until 39 the individual successfully completes either army or air military 40 police occupational training and receives qualifying instruction on 41 Indiana law enforcement prescribed by the adjutant general. 42 (c) An individual appointed to the military police force of the HB 1343—LS 6518/DI 116 33 1 Indiana National Guard shall take an appropriate oath of office in 2 the form and manner prescribed by the governor. 3 Sec. 3. The governor may authorize the military police force of 4 the Indiana National Guard to exercise police powers throughout 5 Indiana, or in any part of Indiana prescribed by the governor, if 6 the governor orders the military police force of the Indiana 7 National Guard to state active duty under IC 10-16-7-7. The 8 governor shall provide reasonable notice to local law enforcement 9 agencies affected by the deployment of the military police force of 10 the Indiana National Guard and coordinate with local law 11 enforcement agencies as circumstances permit. 12 Sec. 4. An individual serving in the military police force of the 13 Indiana National Guard who is authorized to exercise police 14 powers under section 3 of this chapter may: 15 (1) make an arrest; 16 (2) conduct a search or seizure of a person or property; 17 (3) carry a firearm; and 18 (4) exercise other police powers with respect to the 19 enforcement of Indiana laws.


In case you care:

Here's the voting results of the house:

https://legiscan.com/IN/rollcall/HB1343/id/1618347

2
submitted 6 months ago by redfox@infosec.pub to c/indiana@midwest.social

Braun is appointing new commission members

11
submitted 6 months ago by redfox@infosec.pub to c/indiana@midwest.social

Article regarding a local sheriff and allegations of misconduct.

14
submitted 6 months ago by redfox@infosec.pub to c/indiana@midwest.social

Whoa

6
submitted 6 months ago by redfox@infosec.pub to c/indiana@midwest.social
3
submitted 7 months ago by redfox@infosec.pub to c/indiana@midwest.social

I'm surprised he's appointing high paying jobs to new positions during hiring freeze and revoking remote work to cull employees and reduce head count...

4
submitted 7 months ago by redfox@infosec.pub to c/indiana@midwest.social
1
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by redfox@infosec.pub to c/indiana@midwest.social

Article covers Braun's intentions to reduce state employees by revoking remote work - my opinion.

Anyone have really good support for removing remote or hybrid work?

All I hear is rhetoric about productivity in person and collaboration, but too many studies say that's unnecessary.

Is this a veiled attempt to reduce headcount or is there actual legitimacy to removing remote work?

3
submitted 8 months ago by redfox@infosec.pub to c/indiana@midwest.social

Could anyone explain this in a way that doesn't make me hate it?

The usual arguments I relate to are things like: we are taxed multiple times for vehicle ownership. Purchase, plates, mandatory insurance, gas tax, parking. Did I miss any?

Now I know there's plenty of people who would rather have robust public transportation, which would be nice, but I don't see that happening as a result of all this money I'm already paying.

People who make just enough or barely enough to afford to drive to work could now have to pay for the right to trade their precious time for money.

Insert tirade here about that.

I've heard view points regarding tolls:

recover costs to maintain interstate infrastructure used by commercial trucking to move the rolling warehouse of America around so Jeff Bitchboy can have a Venice wedding and I can have my materialistic lifestyle delivered to my door possibly the same day...sorry slipped into rant.

Should I be looking at this a different way before I exercise the almost non-existent power I have as a resident and voter, which is sending emails to my elected corrupt aristocrats and beg them to consider regular people, darn did it again.

5
submitted 8 months ago by redfox@infosec.pub to c/indiana@midwest.social
5
submitted 8 months ago by redfox@infosec.pub to c/indiana@midwest.social

My reading of the article shows a decision that the right of residents to sue the government for neglect actions was not specifically granted in this instance.

-36
submitted 11 months ago by redfox@infosec.pub to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

Public Service Announcement:

Have you checked out Sophos XG Firewall for home use lately?

It's basically an enterprise firewall fully licensed for personal use.

  • All the firewall stuff
  • Normal IPS
  • Built-In easy transparent SSL/TLS proxy
  • Web Application Firewall

I like it better than PF/Open Sense right now.

https://youtu.be/Ui8UC8-MeJU

[-] redfox@infosec.pub 43 points 1 year ago

I'm just glad they're still distracted with torrents...

[-] redfox@infosec.pub 59 points 2 years ago

Every piece of shit greedy corporation can't hide from their lies when they say things are too expensive to implement correctly or pay people appropriately when they are simultaneously posting profits measured in billions...

[-] redfox@infosec.pub 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I like the recent estimates of his appearance. This artist renders him even less good looking than probably most imagined when they think of someone from that region of the world, which makes me believe it's closer to appropriate.

Jesus wasn't a rock star. In Christianity and the new testament, God didn't portray himself in any way other than meager and a bit of a communist. That's the beauty of part of the story.

Edit, I think Jesus would have been easy to put on the no fly list, or walk by without a second thought, which is a challenge to our ways of thinking.

[-] redfox@infosec.pub 39 points 2 years ago

Any chance this is a result of a few decades of consolidation of power, corporate ownership and influence, and partisan political views killing people's trust in the news?

How do you reverse all that?

[-] redfox@infosec.pub 31 points 2 years ago

I didn't see pay listed in the article.

How else do we explain worker shortage? Where did all the people go? Rapture?

On the other side, what better way for a social worker to see real issues and people while studying?

It has to pay well enough for students to be willing to distract from studying.

[-] redfox@infosec.pub 43 points 2 years ago

Since someone else brought up superapps, do they seem like an initial attempt to get around the manufacturer's app store lock-in?

Super apps allow adding mini apps. Seems like an app store.

The goog/apple app stores are already saturated by malware, I can't imagine some mini app store would do better. Even if the big two did do a better job, how would they go about vetting all the code these super apps might have access to?

I guess I'm too jaded, but it seems like just another malware loader you intentionally install.

Am I being too hard on the concept? Are there any really good ones you've used?

[-] redfox@infosec.pub 37 points 2 years ago

You remember how all the US politicians are funded by the same huge corporations and rich people who all benefit from the regulators doing nothing but pretending to care?

Remember how the politicians pander to Americans by blaming rich people for all of life's problems and saying they'll make them pay their fair share, but those politicians have multiple houses and blatantly conduct insider trading every day, but Americans still vote for them time after time?

I'd like to say you could just not use their products, but that means you have to replace windows with some other os, not buy a major manufacturer cell phone, or do much else 🤷

[-] redfox@infosec.pub 34 points 2 years ago

I have a huge issue with judges. They can put people in jail for almost no reason while in their magical room.

They can let murders out on bail, against prosecutors request and not be held liable for the second murder they commit on bail.

Yes, you can appeal verdicts, but that's a long and expensive process. Judges have an extraordinary amount of power that I think should be split amongst multiple. Similar to jury.

[-] redfox@infosec.pub 68 points 2 years ago

So, with all these negative opinions of reddit and spez, I'm both curious what the business world generally thinks of him, and their plan for the business.

Ultimately, the interesting thing will be if investors will give any money when they IPO.

I personally wouldn't, but because I don't like the leaders. Some people don't care, they just want returns where ever they come.

I'm a bit of a hater for this company, and hope their IPO is a flop. We'll see.

[-] redfox@infosec.pub 37 points 2 years ago

Their idea is that is hides all the user info from advertising companies. Downside is your browser is an ad slot machine.

Which is best?

Tracked or ad machine?

I'm more surprised people aren't talking about the fact that since it's running on the client side, someone would just figure out a way to hack and block all the ads even easier.

[-] redfox@infosec.pub 73 points 2 years ago

Sorr, but I love the double sided hypocrisy here.

Here's a chatbot instead of a person, listen to it since we won't take your calls. But, we don't honor what is says!

Thanks Canadian court for giving us a rare middle finger to the business.

[-] redfox@infosec.pub 42 points 2 years ago

I wonder what would have been revealed if he had published tax information on all of Congress.

I feel like them calling for such harsh treatment isnl a defense mechanism for knowing they either use the same tactics,.or they don't like when someone mentions all the legal insider trading/conflict of interest they all do?

I'm pretty sure every senator and rep has more money then everyone I know.

view more: next ›

redfox

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago