If you can, use Firefox.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 418 points 2 years ago* (7 children)

Chrome got blacklisted by our IT dept because of this.

"Ads are attack vectors."

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 106 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    And mine is making the switch from Firefox to Chrome next year. I'm so fucking mad about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 85 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Ditto. The security department made the push because too many people were installing unapproved addons like ublock. They are mandating chrome, "for security". LMAO

    The irony is that people are signing into chrome with personal gmail and leaking stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 94 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    You can lockdown user addons in both chrome and firefox via GPO. You can also auto install them with the same policies if you like. Both browsers have enterpise admx files available.

    Your security department sounds like they are bad at their jobs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Came here to say the exact same thing. It really is amazing to me just how many IT professionals are bad at their jobs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago

    Tech is a boogie man to many executypes. I've seen plenty of IT pros that were in over their head but smooth enough con men. If they keep coming up with things to throw money at/trim money out of convincingly they have long and successful careers.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [+] 245 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 226 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    The Federated Learning of Cohorts and now the Topics API are part of a plan to pitch an "alternative" tracking platform, and Google argues that there has to be a tracking alternative—you can't just not be spied on.

    lmao what the fuck kind of dystopia are we living in

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So this means that the internet could have always worked fine without invasive cookies and everything they told us about it being impossible was just a lie.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Cookies serve important purposes for doing things like keeping you signed in as you navigate through multiple pages on a site.

    The issue is that most parts of the internet were developed by people more interested in all the cool stuff you could do with it, and not at all concerned about the potential misuse by large multi billion dollar corporations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 134 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    "Did any user in the world want a user-tracking and ad platform baked directly into their browser? Probably not, but this is Google, and they control Chrome, and this probably still won't make people switch to Firefox."

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Their idea is that is hides all the user info from advertising companies. Downside is your browser is an ad slot machine.

    Which is best?

    Tracked or ad machine?

    I'm more surprised people aren't talking about the fact that since it's running on the client side, someone would just figure out a way to hack and block all the ads even easier.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You're thinking about it the wrong way. How does this directly and noticably harm the user experience of the average user of chrome? If it doesn't then there's no incentive for them to switch.

    Not everyone knows about this kind of thing or cares. Firefox has to be significantly better in obvious ways and market that to grow their market share.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 86 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    WELL I HOPE YOU FUCKS LIKE SOME WEIRD ASS PORN AND SHITPOSTS

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 78 points 2 years ago

    posted in 9/7/2023, 3:35 PM

  • source
  • [+] 67 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    What's with Lemmy and reposting really old things?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 44 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Does this only affect Chrome or all Chromium based browsers? Are Brave and Edge going to be implementing this too?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Just Chrome in this instance, as it spies for Google. Any anti ad blocking features go though to all chromium based browsers and it is better to switch Firefox. If that browser disappears we won't have a good alternative anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago

    It is better to switch to Firefox. But chromium forks can generally do whatever they want, it's just a matter of maintenance burden. e.g. nothing is stopping a Chromium fork like Brave from running a manifest v2 compatible appstore, but it'll cost money to make, maintain, and operate, plus you have less discoverability as an app developer when using a smaller app store.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 42 points 2 years ago

    All google products are spyware. Although technically they should be called "trackingware".

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    Duck duck go has become a pretty good viable alternative to google using it full time now.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 37 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Another beautiful day of ditching chrome for Firefox a long time ago

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 35 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    It's also already built into Google Play Services. Remember this when they claim a monopoly is good for "security" reasons.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 31 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    I'm totally unable to switch from chrome, the chrome icon is really the only one that works, all others are just too hard to see

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 28 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It's getting harder to remain compassionate towards people who keep using chrome.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 27 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    next up: every page requires shitty chrome or login with google.

    then the big shrug and all continue using chrome, iphone, amazon and the other evils.

    if you are using any of the above YOU are the problem.

    thoughts and prayers. wasch mich, aber mach mich nicht nass.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 26 points 2 years ago (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›