DAMN YOU, OSINT!!!¡¡1!i
Never too late to build your collection, however big or small. My SO got one of those chonky seal plushy about 4 years ago, and they almost never goes away without it now. When I see them leave with their big hiking backpack, the seal plushy squished on the side of it with one of the bag's straps and buckles, I just feel love inside.
Anything to TriGgRe teH LiBZ
IIRC (I don't want to go and relisten to make sure), but pretty sure there were plenty of laughs in the "grab 'em by the pussy" recording.
Does it come preloaded with TeleMessage and a direct connection to Kegseth? I need them bombing plans.
Trump's ~~s~~pee~~ch at _____ con~~ta~~ined lies and cons~~p~~iracy th~~e~~ories about _____~~
Never forget
I agree that it would be safer eventually, but also, testing in vitae might not be the good way to do it. Sure, testing in prod is fast, but there is a reason we don't do it.
Myope co-pope use scope and spot new pope mope, cope with dope, and elope.
Yeah, people, don't follow Wim Hof in having enemas on public fountains.
Here ya go bud : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titer
Was it a bullshit generalization? Sure. I've seen the "doing a lot of projection without realizing it" mostly - but not exclusively - from those considered "right wing", but they're not the only one doing it. I'm sure I've been guilty of it at a time or another, but if you ask everyone that spouts bullshit generalization to "get lost", given that
People only ever care once something affects them personally
Is also a bullshit generalization, I'd say we should both get lost.
Not together, evidently.
pticrix
0 post score0 comment score
I'll spell out for you why I feel these two things are the same. You're welcome to disagree, but maybe it will give you some pointers as to why a lot of people are annoyed by these LLM copy-pasta.
First, a note for your ego : Remember, we don't know you! You might have read through the whole thing that the LLM generated, and then cross-referenced the sources it gave you and then found some more, and you established the veracity of what it told you. OR you might have not bothered and just copy-pasted it for the clout, I guess, which is what the majority of LLM users do when publishing these answers. Ask for some explanations on how to solve a problem to a student who let a LLM give them the answer to an assignment instead of doing the work, if you need proof. 9/10 won't be able to, because they didn't bother to understand it - and I'm being generous in my statistics, in my experience.
There's also a lot of research that hints that the long term effect of using this tool in that way are deleterious to your critical thinking skills.
We don't know you, so, chances are you're in the lot of the majority, as far as we're concerned.
Then, given that you probably didn't put much effort into this text (as far as we can tell), there is an imbalance of effort required for us to look through it critically. Why the fuck would we put in the effort, if you most likely were not keen in putting so much in yourself? That's kinda disrespectful, and egotistical. And also why I feel I am justified to assume that ctrl+c/ctrl+v an LLM output directly is tantamount to copy pasting a list of link from google. If you went through the trouble of validating the LLM output, how about just writing with your own word what you just realized / learned / validated? You can even dictate with tons of FOSS software nowadays if you're unable to type!
So that's what I have for now, food for your thoughts I hope. I'm sure I could find more reasons, but I'm going to go do something fun instead.