Because it's water.
You'd have to settle for close enough here. You might even drink from the same glass. Beyond that ... until we invent telepathy.
With a bit of careful effort we can improve the process.
In fields where communication matters more we have several methods for that.
Get a glass of water and taste it. It tastes like that.
You could stand next to the guy while you both look at the relevant thing. That's a pretty good way.
Another way would be to use the same method for looking at the relevant thing. Let's call it "an experimental method". Because it delivers an experience.
Makes sense. If we try, if we are careful, the quality of our communication can be vastly improved.
In my own particular field I often first try to ensure that all participants in the conversation share the same experience.
I agree. And criteria for the moderators too of course.
I'm shooting for an objective, real-value kind of perspective here.
Surely we aren't striving for quantity over quality. Because that's where this sorta leads
Jump for that low hanging fruit little buddy
Oompaloompas.
Willy Wonka had to literally rescue them and protect them to keep them from being eaten because they're so delicious.
Alright thanks