peoplebeproblems

joined 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm a fan of it too. Actually I think my dad did a bunch of stuff when he was in grad school on holography.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

OP is aware that it does exist. In quantum physics, a lot of the questions of "why does it exist" are difficult to overcome. The answer simply is "it just does."

We can prove the math, we see the experimental evidence. The math comes long before the experiments. The problem is that "why" doesn't work at this scale.

For a frictionless spherical cow in a vacuum, if you apply a force vector to it, it will accelerate in that direction, until you stop applying the force; at which point it will continue on that vector at the last velocity it reached. "Why" this occurs is do to energy, and energy conservation.

"Why do massless fermions spontaneously break chiral symmetry?" We can prove it through the math, we can experimentally observe it. But "why" doesn't have a real answer. The answer is "it just does."

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I have never heard of this before

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know what you just did

And I don't know if it's legal

And I'm scared and need an adult

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Man I only took through QED. QCD is where shit goes from freaky to "what the fuck reality, stop drinking"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

I just enjoyed how new freaky symbols being used for operators started popping up out of nowhere.

Because without them you run out of paper too fast

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (9 children)

No no no. Quantum Physics: the more you understand about the universe, the less it gives a shit if it makes any sense.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The dude was 74, and pissed he lost an election to the first incumbent?

So he shoots himself?

That... Well. Ok I have no fucking idea how it clears much up, but he didn't like that outcome by the look of it.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well guess that means he's guilty!

Of, what exactly?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pfizer cited inflation and R&D costs

Woah woah woah hold on. Aren't most of those R&D costs covered by a government grant? You can't use that as an out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Correct, but they still have to convince a judge to issue that secret warrant.

The judge would require probable cause, which doesn't have to be slam dunk evidence, but it does still have to be obtained legally.

OP was saying that the FBI could easily wiretap, but in order to make the evidence legally permitted in court, they'd still need probable cause to get the secret warrant that would allow them to do the wiretap.

It's sort of a loop-hole-in-a-loop-hole with the courts.

Usually the FBI just has to use the non-legal wiretap to point them to a good source of probable cause. Then they issue that to the judge, get their secret warrant, then make the non-legal wiretap legal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

According to the psych the only things that line up well with ASD are my masking symptoms which are indistinguishable from ADHD masking. Well and my generalized anxiety.

The big commonly talked about things- black and white thinking, narrow interests, behavior camouflaging, ignorance of social cues, or flat affect are absent.

Though interestingly my exwife has all of that, and it didn't occur to me until after we moved apart. She was hot, I was young, young men tend to ignore obvious problems until it's way too late.

view more: ‹ prev next ›