[-] myszka@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

You don't even need to be an experienced developer to see how bad AI created code is. AI just hallucinates too much. I tried asking ChatGPT to write a fairly simple shell script script for me a few times and it added non-existent commands or references EACH times.

Honestly I think AI has other fields of application. It's good when you do something yourself but need an approximation about something. However trying to replace humans with it is just a sign of misunderstanding of the technology. AI shouldn't be called Artificial Intelligence in the first place (damn good marketing tho). It's more like a way of automating statistics.

[-] myszka@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago

It's just rejecting your responsibility in the way you behave. "It's not me, it's the nature"

[-] myszka@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 months ago

Oh boy, I got so confused when I was a beginner and some American kid told me "would of" is an alternative to "would have"

[-] myszka@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

Oh wow, it's so cool you speak Esperanto! Can you share your experience with it? Where do you use it? What good Esperanto communities are there? Do you find it actually useful? In what ways did it enrich your life?

101
submitted 2 months ago by myszka@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Everyone seems so good at English so I wondered how many people learned it to such proficiency and how many are just natives

[-] myszka@lemmy.ml 76 points 2 months ago

Human nature on its deathbed when it realizes it forgot to account for Karl Marx

47
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by myszka@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

I'm a very much pro free software person and I used to think that GPL is basically the only possible option when it comes to benefits for free software (and not commercial use), but I've recently realised this question is actually much more ambiguous.

I think there are two sides to this issue:

  • GPL forces all contributions to stay open-source which prevents commercialisation* of FOSS projects, but also causes possible interference of corporate software design philosophy and all kinds of commercial decisions, if contributions come from companies.
  • MIT-like permissive licenses, on the other hand, easily allow for making proprietary forks, which, however, separates commercial work from the rest of the project, therefore making the project more likely to stay free both of corporate influence and in general.

So it boils down to the fact, that in my opinion what makes free software free is not only the way it's distributed but also the whole philosophy behind it: centralisation vs. decentralisation, passive consumer vs. co-developper role of the user etc. And this is where things start to be a bit controversial.

What do you think?

*UPD: wrong word. I mean close-sourcing and turning into a profitable product instead of something that fulfils your needs

[-] myszka@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

Gotta love Finnish philosophy!

[-] myszka@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 months ago

It is getting worse. Humanity is entering a deeper and deeper crisis. Alienation is growing with each passing year. The inner contradiction in every one of us is getting more intense, which manifests itself in more external conflicts: between people, between people and nature, between everything.

That being sad, this crisis just highlights the slow death of the previous, deeply troubled era and marks the transition to another way of living. The destructive aspect of things, that we all suffer from, is therefore not absolute. It is not going to destroy neither us nor the world around us. It is balanced off by the progress that we're making.

Take 3d printing, for example. If you think of it, it is actually the (very) beginning of something fundamentally new: local automated production. Automation eliminates the routine part of producing goods, which makes the process creative again, while not compromising on efficiency. This leads to production becoming a means of self-actualisation rather than something that takes away all your freedom. And since the process of making new things gives you value instead of taking it, the need for charging others for using your creations vanishes, giving way to free exchange and collaboration. This, if applied globally, would solve the fundamental issue of our current society, where creating good takes away just as much, making any growth a form of self-destruction. And solving that would spare us of all different kinds of problems, ranging from pollution, wars to emotional abuse.

So I think by getting worse it's also getting better and these difficult times we've happened to live in are still marvelous.

P.S. Apart from 3d printing, there's, of course, free software movement as well, which in my opinion is also part of the global free production evolution

[-] myszka@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The will to understand other people and to grow as a person yourself.

[-] myszka@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago

For me everything after childhood seems to be the best part of life, because after you grow up you finally can make your life the way you want and if you have enough strength you can make it absolutely wonderful.

Childhood can be cool too but only if you happen to be born to a good family.

[-] myszka@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago

This! Steam is the only proprietary program I use on my Linux machines that I'm actually happy with and don't want to get rid of

[-] myszka@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Good linux mobile OSs already exist, but phones' hardware is still proprietary and messed up, so it is very difficult to provide a good hardware support for those mobile OSs

[-] myszka@lemmy.ml 36 points 3 months ago

You should try assembly. Pure goto hell

view more: next ›

myszka

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 months ago