mrbeano

I wouldn't say that it's a vote split down gender lines, but we do seem to be deciding if we want to keep trying to achieve gender equality or go full throttle on toxic patriarchy

I'm not your guyie, brotendo

I just don't understand mobile game ads anymore

Well said. Half the country is already exercising option 1, and that's not creating positive change. ACTUAL change is local, and slow. You need ground-swell to affect national elections.

Ok! 3 of those links are from injury lawyers (always dependable sources of data when analyzing risk. No profit motive there.) 1 is a 404. 1 is an abstract from NIH that summarizes: "bad people own bad dogs"

Dog identification is difficult, and even those scary looking pits may only have a small percentage of actual Staffordshire or Bulldog in their DNA. I don't want people to get hurt either, but dog racism isn't the answer. A bad owner can turn any dog violent.

They obviously did it in less then 30 minutes