Sounds about right. Still waiting for Stanger Things season 4, part 3, subsection 8: the final final chapter.
I didn't even realize they had already made a third season. It was three years between S1 and S2, but six months between S2 & S3? That's really odd.
Yeah, general rule would be not to go drinking in public unless it's explicitly allowed. Even if it isn't illegal, I suspect you could still have people or the police bother you.
He was detained!! They handcuffed him!
What is this forcibly removed nonsense. They handcuffed a senator who wanted to know what DHS is doing in HIS state!
This is what they always do, get you arguing about something that doesn't matter. Just eats up time and energy about nothing.
This is clearly about the US stock market crashing. In that case it's always the days gain/loss, in which case Yang is the only person who is right.
This is important because a lot of people saw "down 10%" and now "up 10%" without realizing that's still day over day loss.
I've been to that museum. It is extremely bizzare with a bunch of real penises from all sorts of animals (and people) floating in jars. The facts on all the plaques are kinda fun, but many of the penises are in questionable state.
Also the museum was started by someone who was randomly gifted a whip made from a bulls penis. That kicked off a weird fascination and he started both collecting and being gifted more and more until he figured they might as well open a museum.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icelandic_Phallological_Museum
Read the chart, it says taxable income.
Deductions and other tax games may lower you're taxable income, but the progressive tax brackets apply this way to all taxable income.
Haha given Kevin Sorbos went down a similar path, this is pretty fitting.
Pretty sure that's most oven/stove top timers as many intermediate steps in baking/cooking require set time intervals, meaning rarely do you want things to turn off when a timer ends.
It's great seeing time and time again that no one really does understand these models and that their preconceived notions of what biases exist ends up shooting them in the foot. It truly shows that they don't really understand how systematically problematic the underlying datasets are and the repurcussions of relying on them too heavily.
jacksilver
0 post score0 comment score
Yeah probably while making a tool/smashing something. Knocking two rocks together, create a spark on accident, boom fire.