Never get used to this. I get what you are saying but I don't think this is the right response.
ivn
joined 1 year ago
En anglais, c'’est plus simple pour chercher des choses sur internet après (message d’erreur, nom d’une option…)
It feels like you are missing the point on purpose. I don't know why, this feels like laziness.
Criticizing the existence of billionaires and being antiwork are two different things. And being antiwork is different than wanting to do nothing. No one wants to do nothing, except in cases of major depressions.
A lot of antiwork post can lack depth but there are really interesting criticism to be made about work as it's organized these days. I suggest you dig the subject.
No, use uBlock Origin.
Why would anyone use a browser that requires you to login, especially after that: https://kibty.town/blog/arc/
Nah, uBlock Origin is the must have, Privacy Badger doesn't bring anything more.
No one is going to read first hand what you are up to. It's just companies trying to automate pricing based on data they collect so they can up prices when you need something the most. That's just one simple example so you can understand but there are plenty of other things you can do with the collected data.
This is also important because they'll just straight up sell it to data brokers that'll aggregate it, make it searchable and sell access to it to just anybody. And even if you feel your are not an interesting target now you never know how it'll be in the futur, once the data is out you can't do much.
You can re-use those but so does anyone, so you should consider those accounts as public.
Arkenfox put it in the "Don't bother" list: https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions#-dont-bother
Consent-o-matic is about consent forms, so it'll fill the consent forms giving, by default, the least consent possible. If it doesn't know how to handle a form it'll just not auto-fill it so you'll have to do it yourself. It's not just about cookies, they are just one common way to acquire the data. IDCAC will just hide the form, because it was made to hide cookie notices and later extended to do the same for consent forms. According to the law not filling the form, not giving explicit consent, is like refusing it.
Anyway, none of these extension touch cookies directly, they are only about notice and consent forms. It's up to the website to act accordingly. And none of this will do anything about necessary cookies, or more precisely, about any data deemed necessary, however it's collected.
view more: next ›
Pu-erh for me.