The result of all this may be catastrophic. Should a worst-case scenario ever occur — a cyberattack, a natural disaster, an internet outage — there may be no human workers left with the skills that once kept food on the shelves.

Very nerdy of me, but this reminds me of a Stargate SG-1 episode "the Sentinel." The team travels to a planet whose civilization relies on fully automated technology. The people don't have to operate or maintain it (normally), so their society has completely forgotten how. In the episode, one set of antagonists comes in and sabotages their defense system, and another set sees the opportunity and invades. The protagonists have to then figure out the defense system and fix it.

We don't live in a TV series. There aren't benevolent outsiders who will swoop down and save our systems in the nick of time when they break down. We're headed in a bad direction.

Change the problem from 3 doors to a million. Kids pick a door, and the host opens 999,998 doors, leaving theirs and one other door closed. One of the closed doors is the winner. Do they want to switch now?

FYI the enforcement arms of CBP and ICE do not shut down. Just the departments in DHS that would perform oversight over ICE and CBP. So don't expect boots on the ground to reduce in any way because of this.

I think she's saying she could have allocated the GPUs to Azure to game the metrics, but Microsoft chose to allocate them to internal projects, which is a form of self-investment. She's not saying they made the wrong decision, she's saying their decision in this longer-term investment makes the short-term metrics worse.

"Pressuring" how? Any institution with teeth Trump has already neutered.

What ghouls. Let people live the lives they want.

Simple answer: no. We're beyond that now. ICE's latest strategy is simply to move so fast, courts and lawyers don't have time to do anything. There are dozens of credible news reports of them deporting US citizens, which means there are dozens, or hundreds or thousands, that haven't been reported on. They don't have to follow the rules if there's no practical way to hold them accountable, and they're leveraging that heavily.

If you don't have your papers, they deport you. If you do have your papers, they lie and deport you faster than anyone can stop them.

You can see this very clearly flying almost anywhere. It's most obvious in places like the Midwest US, but even between cities in more densely populated regions, there's so much farmland. Islands of concrete in oceans of ordered crop fields.

Men's rights to what, exactly? There are plenty of rights that affect men that vary state to state. Off the top of my head I can think of firearm rights that vary dramatically state to state. Or are we talking about rights exclusive to men because of different biology between men and women? I feel like other than a vasectomy, I'm not sure what other male-biology-related rights I have. Honestly there's less technology related to reproduction on the male side.

I get the point of the message, that there are rights women should be universally guaranteed that aren't, and I totally agree with that message. But the phrasing seems ambiguous at best.

AI is going to destroy a lot of software companies in a way I haven't seen talked about yet: it will give CEOs exactly what they ask for.

Before you jump in with "AI produces garbage and isn't reliable by design," let me say I agree with you 100%, but for the sake of argument, assume for a moment it could produce a high quality product.

Once a company gets large enough, very often the CEO gets completely removed from how their company actually works. I know I've worked at several companies where the job of my boss was to shield me from corporate nonsense so I could make an actually good product. If I and/or my boss were replaced with AI that actually followed the corporate nonsense, the company would go belly-up quite quickly.

I think many CEOs are looking to replace huge fleets of workers with AI they can directly prompt. Even if it worked flawlessly, since they don't know how their products actually bring value to their customers, they will speed-run torpedoing their company's place in the market by their own ignorance, ego, and overconfidence.

Republicans drew the state’s new map to give the GOP five additional seats, and Missouri and North Carolina followed with new maps adding an additional Republican seat each. To counter those moves, California voters approved a ballot initiative to give Democrats an additional five seats there.

The redrawn maps are facing court challenges in California, Missouri and North Carolina.

How much you want to bet SCOTUS blocks California's redistricting but greenlights Missouri and North Carolina maps, each through tortured logic?

The problem is that some small but non-zero fraction of these bugs may be exploitable security flaws with the software, and these bug reports are on the open internet. So if they just ignore them all, they risk overlooking a genuine vulnerability that a bad actor can then more easily find and use. Then the FOSS project gets the blame, because the bug report was there, they should have fixed it!