hairyfeet

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Guess he won't be eating his own tomato puree then

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

Why has Charlie Kirk's face been edited and expanded to fit his head?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 8 months ago

Apple ties their hardware to iTunes with no competition. Steam offer a platform which is better than every other piece of COMPETING software on a variety of hardware.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

Is that a scale?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Will it work on the steam deck?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 11 months ago

It's the people that push to get their bags out asap. You also get the morons that can't sit down when the seat belt sign is on at take off.

Are you not allowed to stand up during flights where you're from? 15 minutes take off/landing & taxiying isn't torture.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This a UK politician where the NHS is not run for profit. Sumak is a shit who has had private meetings with US health care companies assumably to try to sell of parts of the NHS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Got anything for DIY, plumbing/carpentry etc... please?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2006/dec/20/cruises.green

Not at all. This article is 17 years old and planes have only gotten more efficient whilst the same old cruise ships continue to so the seas.

Plus a more recent article

https://www.treehugger.com/what-is-greener-boat-vs-plane-emissions-5185547

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The presenter focuses on argument 1 because he says the other points are "obviously correct" and therefore moral. Imo that's flawed.

  1. Hunger disease etc are part of a natural cycle which controls population and ecosystem balance.

  2. Luxuries are of no significance is not obviously true. Our economic system means that purchasing items of "no moral significance" feeds into a system which supports livelihoods and, in a functional government, provides welfare and health care to populations.

  3. There are multiple areas where money could be focused instead of Oxfam etc which could be seen as moral- R&D, luxuries as per 3

(It might just be that I don't like philosophy)

view more: ‹ prev next ›