I blame Chomsky.
Ukraine and Israel are military allies. They're also both supplied by the US military industrial complex.
How was that pedantic? Do pedantic quibbles fundamentally change what a statement means? They're generally used to imply somebody meant something different than what the listener knew they met. A difference in historical context between your situation and the situation described in the Communist Manifesto is not a pedantic difference. Words mean things.
No time for English or manners lessons, I suppose. Where did cartoon Twitter guy say people have to become homeless? You just assumed that's what they meant because you don't understand there's a difference between housing in the United States and other Western countries that is backed by the global dollar system. It seems like a lot of people here are reinforcing each other's misinterpretations of basic things. The reason why you have homeless people in your country is because the property values of your parents' homes need to increase. Of course, this is more of a 10% than a 1% of the 1% critique, but I think we pay too much attention to latter and not enough to the former these days. You're talking about homeowners and comparing them to Laos. You absolutely cannot be serious. Are we going to compare American farmers to Vietnamese farmers next?
EDIT: It may amuse all of you to hear that cartoon Twitter guy is not happy with my replies either.
I must ask the inspiration behind your choice of name
China has a fundamentally different property system from the United States. When you're buying into home ownership, you're buying into a global asset market where the Cosmopolitan bourgeoisie puts its money.
I'm sorry, but by comparing China's home ownership to America's, you're as incoherent as this cartoon Twitter guy. I don't think anybody else has mentioned the asset market either. I don't really think there's any framework here for a serious discussion.
It will really be a joy to see Americans decide more and more countries are imperialist, as their sanctions work on fewer of them. Five years ago, a glorified gas station. Now, a great power. You guys are great at playing the victim.
By brigade, they mean actual forces sent by reddit to Ukraine. They were some of the first people wiped out by a missile strike in training. As mercenaries are not afforded humanitarian privileges like soldiers.
It can't be a programming humor post without somehow even more mind-numbing stuff in the comments. Just part of the fun
This isn't cause for celebration. Doge has accomplished its goal of disintegrating federal services which will never return. What do you think will happen to its personnel? Will this negatively impact their careers? I certainly don't think so.
Since day one...
Better late than never ig
getoffthatchronic
0 post score0 comment score
This isn't even about competency really as the cost of AI is being artificially depressed through all of these businesses running at a loss. It might be insane to stick in a blender with US labor statistics. Hopefully not the kind the WH uses?
There are a lot of different things falling under the umbrella of AI. You're right to be skeptical of an algorithm's ability to estimate another algorithm's ability in practice. They're testing how well the buzzword tech can move the needle on numbers the fed obsesses over. Really pigeonholing the tech into profitability. Best uses of this tech will be in balancing electricity flows through the country, with inputs including population + industry usage, weather patterns & other renewable energy variables (these are very much a social good but you can already hear capital hissing at the thought). Humans already operate many cybernetic systems that turn on volition, with inputs adjusted to make them exploitative. Streamlining them is going to rip the balls right off for sure. As I often quote Michael Parenti by recently, "You're stupid if you think they're stupid," it goes nicely with "the purpose of a system is what it does."