froztbyte

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

we call them autoplag(iarism) machines, much more honest

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

also lol @ the pure Ronald Reagan energy of going “yep obviously drugs just make you murderously insane”

always think of this (which is just multiple kinds of amazing in the current day; that it keeps getting used as a sample in dance tracks is just even better)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hasn’t it crested 100k like 3~5 times now? Feels like reruns on a cruise ship

Also, feels telling that 100k is the number people manipulate to/against? (in the why not 125/150/200k way (yes ofc I get that it’s just people trying to milk fresh rubes etc, merely pondering the selected target))

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

and then posting walls of text about them not merely burying the lede but quite fully conspiring to eliminate the evidence and all witnesses in the same go, as a starting condition

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (14 children)

currently in vc delusion, the public just doesn’t understand how to move about efficiently

the levels of not-even-wrong from these dipshits continue to be astounding

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

taking bets: did they name it after the one thing none of them have so they can finally claim to have some?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I’ve been wondering about this

One the one hand, military procurement (at least afaik) tends toward complete functional product

On the other hand, military R&D programs have been among the most spectacularly profligate financial black holes in recent decades

None of the options involved feel great, even if “it gets shunted from mil procurement and all industry claims get publicly brandished as the bullshit it is” comes to pass (which tbh still feels like an optimistic outcome, with unclear time horizons)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

fwiw this link didn't jump me to a specific reply (if you meant to highlight a particular one)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

so is corbet the same kind of fucker that'll complain "everything is so political nowadays"? it seems like they are

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I, too, have done the “all communication is manipulative”, but in the same way as one would do a bar trick:

all communication is manipulative, for any words I say/write that you perceive instantly manipulate (as in the physical manner / modifying state) your thoughts, and this is done so without you requesting I do so

it’s a handy stunt with which to drive an argument about a few parts of communication, rhetoric, etc. because it gives a kinda good handle on some meta without getting too deep into things

(although there was one of my friends who really, really hated the framing)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

lemmy’s own post-formatting code

oh but see, it has at least 2-if-you-squint representations of things (and possibly more? it's been a while since I read the code). it's got "raw", which represents semi sorta whatever the user input

iirc it broadly takes that for a local render (as in on the site frontend)

and then it also makes a $something for the thing it sends out over ActivityPub

I do want to make it clear that I'm not carrying water for lemmy here, fwiw. this'd be a legit cool thing to add to things (whether the spape it took was "renders latex locally, and ships images remote" or whatever). just saying it might be hairy

view more: ‹ prev next ›