froztbyte

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

inference-tasks focused coprocessor

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (9 children)

apparently those qualcomm NPUs (the "AI assist" chips in the copilot(?) laptops) aren't very good

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

my bet: tweets that came to felon's attention which he couldn't view because the poster had block felon

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

shitty comment, I blame the poster

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

the upside of it listing a pile of author names: one can go look up their published works, and add them to crank trackers if necessary (seems likely)

the ToC is some fantastical fucking nonsense

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

only needs a quantum chapter somewhere in there for bonus scoring round..

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

this is one hell of a hat trick

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

saw this via a friend earlier, forgot to link. xcancel

socmed administrator for a conf rolls with liarsynth to "expand" a cropped image, and the autoplag machine shits out a more sex-coded image of the speaker

the mindset of "just make some shit to pass muster" obviously shines through in a lot of promptfans and promptfondlers, and while that's fucked up I don't want to get too stuck on that now. one of the things I've been mulling over for a while is pondering what a world (and digital landscape) with a richer capability for enthusiastic consent could look like. and by that I mean, not just more granular (a la apple photo/phonebook acl) than this current y/n bullshit where a platform makes a landgrab for a pile of shit, but something else entirely. "yeah, on my gamer profile you can make shitposts, but on academic stuff please keep it formal" expressed and traceable

even if just as a thought experiment (because of course there's lots of funky practical problems, combined with the "humans just don't really exist that way" effort-tax overhead that this may require), it might inform about some avenues of how to to go about some useful avenues on how to go about handling this extremely overt bullshit, and informing/shaping impending norms

(e: apologies for semi stream of thought, it's late and i'm tired)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

There’s no way this works, right?

the US legal system has this remarkable "little" failure mode where it is easily repurposed to be not an engine of justice, but instead of engine of enforcing whatever story you can convince someone of

(the extremely weird interaction(s) of "everything allowed except what is denied", case precedent, and the abovementioned interaction mode, result in some really fucking bad outcomes)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I don't understand/can't see the point you're trying to make

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

You have to blame the deep-nestedness of k8s resources for unreadability

this shit happens because FUCKING GO is a piece of shit (cf that post (from iirc fasterthanlime?) about how the go apis infect everything)

which should not be read as me supporting k8s, fwiw. fuck that noise too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

or you could use something like qrencode that already is a thing and pipe it to image viewer of your choice

(my bad, I actually just looked at the images earlier, missed that you said that)

view more: ‹ prev next ›