[-] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

looking for advice/suggestions:

anyone seen anything yet (uBlock ruleset, {tamper,grease}monkey scripts, etc) that can block the "talk to our prompt" widgets that have started showing up on too many fucking webpages? I'm getting sick of the things, and I haven't really yet found an exhaustive list of this shit from which to build up a list

[-] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

I heard someone say Private Reasoning was around the corner. Think they’re related?

[-] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

some circumstances is still legal in the u.s.

as someone else pointed out, US-wide legal slavery (enshrined in constitution) in the form of prisoners

[-] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

haha yeah I got very "we just need $29.95 billion bro just $29.95b trust me bro it'll be so intelligent bro just watch" impression from that as well

[-] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

wow we get changelogs now, fancy

[-] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

the for x in y statement takes iterable y and assigns a value from it to x per iteration (loop), so what happens is that it's reassigning chosen_char each loop to the next item from the sentence

(sum([x for x in sentence if x == chosen_char]) would be a quick one-liner, presuming one has downcased the sentence and other input/safety checks)

(e: this post was in response to your 2-liner comment in the code)

[-] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

yeah this is the thing I’ve been thinking a lot about

fucking reCaptcha is literally mass-weaponising users for data filtration, and there is no good counter besides just not using reCaptcha (which is something one can’t easily pull off without things like regulatory action, massive reputational problems that make people gtfo, etc)

I have similar worries about cloudflare being such a massive chokepoint and using that position to enable “ai bot filter” services. feels extremely monopolistic, but ianal and I’m not entirely sure what the case grounds/structure on that would be (if any)

the only other viable strategy at the moment is fully breaking contact with any potential bad traffic systems, and that’s extremely fucking dire because that’s yet another nail in the coffin of the increasingly less open internet

[-] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

thankfully Nate doesn’t seem that bad

"yet"

and probably just in public. seems highly likely some of it is "just" in private at this stage, given employer and focuses

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

two from the same esteemed poster:

That sounds very "leftist" in circular-logic where more money means you are axiomatically automatically the most guilty regardless of level of harm caused. Which means that if you were to become the first trillionare by curing 95% of all forms of cancer then you are clearly history's greatest monster.

Alright then so when do we go from it being tax deductible to outright banning private charity as "undemocratic"?

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

this is an absolutely accursed post, well done

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

you know, it'd be a damn shame if someone made one of those megalists which contained all the various places that had promptboxes that could be used to synthesize bad code without having to pay your own money to openai subscriptions or so

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

long live the trypophobia & ommetaphobia automation tool

view more: ‹ prev next ›

froztbyte

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago