[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

I heard someone say Private Reasoning was around the corner. Think they’re related?

[-] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

some circumstances is still legal in the u.s.

as someone else pointed out, US-wide legal slavery (enshrined in constitution) in the form of prisoners

[-] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

this is an extremely strange and problematic take

[-] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

25085 N + Oct 15 GitHub ( 19K) Your free GitHub Copilot access has expired

tinyviolin.bmp

[-] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

thankfully Nate doesn’t seem that bad

"yet"

and probably just in public. seems highly likely some of it is "just" in private at this stage, given employer and focuses

[-] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

comment history also includes simulation hypothesis and some very eagleflavoured political analysis

I have a prediction!

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

naw bro we've got indexes bro it'll be fine bro

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

20 bucks the datastructure was designed for easiest access from the semantics of whatever du jour js lib they were using for the app

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

oh is that how come I get so much popcorn around these discussions? 🤔 makes sense when you think about it!

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

they've been indexing in this manner across the board and tbh I don't quite follow the logic in some cases. for the pay-to-play search ranking shitsites (and other things that surface a lot of adspace) it makes a bit more sense, but for things like books..? why?

and I realize that this is pondering downstream effects of The No Fucks Given Company's internal development processes and things, but even so

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As far as I can tell the argument basically boils down to “we’ll just use SO MUCH electricity that the utility will have no choice but to invest in green energy just to keep up”

yep. and I like using the rule 34 defense on them: "if that were desired, someone already would've made it"

these fucking clowns permanently don't want to acknowledge (or just stay willfully ignorant about?) the fact that it's easier to do cost and regulatory arbitrage by hunting for presently-favourable miner locations from which to burn electricity than it is to invest into (and possibly, likely even, invent!) whole-ass new green tech with sufficient output for their preferred ourobouros

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

"good or bad"? there is no good here. good would be when openai finally closes down. anything else is still just a shitty option from many shitty options.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

froztbyte

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago