okay I’m curious, is that worth in sunk cost (dollars spent), or some ostensible secondary market valuation?
froztbyte
joined 2 years ago
it takes a certain kind of person to come up with “I am incapable of participating in this conversation, QED the internet is dead”
I dub it: “induncetive reasoning”
you seem to have different definitions on a lot of things
You’re communication style will be replaced. Your place in the world is not valued. No one is viewing your response and gaining anything. Congratulations on being a perpetuation on the dead internet theory.
wow, unintentional sunday morning art exhibit. foaming-at-the-mouth rabid and unhinged art, but art nonetheless!
“I’m not sure about the downvotes” sigh, how many times do we have to see this stupid refrain
imagine reflecting on feedback. or do promptfans need mirror-finished text inputs to pretend to do that thinking for them too?
the for x in y statement takes iterable y and assigns a value from it to x per iteration (loop), so what happens is that it's reassigning chosen_char each loop to the next item from the sentence
(sum([x for x in sentence if x == chosen_char]) would be a quick one-liner, presuming one has downcased the sentence and other input/safety checks)
(e: this post was in response to your 2-liner comment in the code)
istg I don't think I'll ever truly grok US corporate stans
excited to once again be discussing the novel philosophical depths in questions such as “what if ultron were right tho”
this is an extremely strange and problematic take
yes, the massive waste of resources involved is definitely “funny”, that’s definitely the bit of this awful shit to post a take about
make better posts