reminder: one does not, under any circumstances, have to "give it to them". these weird fuckers already have all the water carriers they need
and no, it doesn't appear to be the case that this person is merely a shitty writer
(nor is that the only thing they're shitty about)
If LLMs were worth the hype then you’d have actual proof of utility
you think I'm promptfan-posting? impressive.
did you know the report also publishes the details of its analysis methodology?
my god, where are you people coming from today
that article misses one of the delicious parts of that story: they called saltman a “podcast bro” in derision
this is an extremely strange and problematic take
those self-crush, it's apparently a feature not a bug
thankfully Nate doesn’t seem that bad
"yet"
and probably just in public. seems highly likely some of it is "just" in private at this stage, given employer and focuses
20 bucks the datastructure was designed for easiest access from the semantics of whatever du jour js lib they were using for the app
When OpenAI issued a casting call last year for a secret project to endow OpenAI’s popular ChatGPT with a human voice, the flier had several requests: The actors should be nonunion. They should sound between 25 and 45 years old. And their voices should be “warm, engaging [and] charismatic.”
One thing the artificial intelligence company didn’t request, according to interviews with multiple people involved in the process and documents shared by OpenAI in response to questions from The Washington Post: a clone of actress Scarlett Johansson
gotta love the lucy-football here. "no no, we never requested that it sound like her!"
sure leaves out whether it was chosen to be that. of all the voice actors out there, they just happened to stumble over and choose the exact one that had a voice like scarjo? happens to everyone, all the time. just like forgetting your keys as you walk out the front door. perfectly normal. pay no attention to the other attempts to get legal cover on delivery day...
oh is that how come I get so much popcorn around these discussions? 🤔 makes sense when you think about it!
you need to look at better art
“we set up a pocket universe for our toy robot to run in, looped it a few billions times, and you wouldn’t believe what ways it found to fuck with the rules! we’re ever so shocked! :o” is a going staple in ML agent research for years now, these people are a parody upon themselves
remember that “agents in a physics sim” shit a few years ago (both early goog and openai, I think)? that strain of nonsense