[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

don't post slop, nobody wants to read any of that

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

i aim to please

[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

the post is fake regardless, its just another rightwing shitpost account. doubt there's a kid at all

[-] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

goddammit! you have no idea how many variations of "first person walking simulator projected image texture trippy visuals" i slapped into every search engine!

but yes, that was the one i was thinking of

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

oh fuck he's that asshole? the one that was so petty about a negative Polygon review for said game that he stalked the reviewer's Twitter page until he could find a quote to mangle into a recommendation to put on the game's Steam page? including the reviewer's full name, against the reviewer's repeated, explicit wishes for it to be removed?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

huh, that actually worked

annoying to have to do, but thank you regardless

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Asked to comment, a Meta spokesperson told The Register, "We value input from civil society organizations and academic institutions for the context they provide as we constantly work toward improving our services. Meta's defense filed with the Brazilian Consumer Regulator questioned the use of the NetLab report as legal evidence, since it was produced without giving us prior opportunity to contribute meaningfully, in violation of local legal requirements."

translation: they knew we would either squash the investigation attempt outright or change their research methodology and results until we looked like the good guys, and that kind of behavior cannot be tolerated

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

that's one possible reason, yeah. just seems like a really odd choice -- much like the fact that they dislike "crypto promotion" but still accept payment for secrets in crypto. doesn't feel like it would be that hard to find a sympathetic furry artist willing to draw in a nondistinct style or keep work under wraps. idk

the only reason it seems odd to me is that the overwhelming majority of furries either actively dislike or hate "ai art". maybe they're the odd ones out, or they just don't care for a throwaway group

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

never read this one before. neat story, even if it is not much more than The Lorax, but psychedelic-flavored.

unprompted personal review (spoilers)

it makes sense that the point-of-view character is insulated / isolated from the harm they're doing. my main gripe is that in doing so, the actual problems of the hypothetical psychedelic healthcare industry (manufactured addiction, orientalism and psychedelic colonization, inequality of access, in addition to all of the vile stuff the real healthcare industry already does) wind up left barely stated or only implied. i was waiting for the other shoe to drop; for Learie to, say, receive a letter from a family member of a patient who died on the bed due to being unattended to, a result of stretching too few staff too thin over too many patients, et cetera. something that would pop the bubble that she built around herself and tie the themes of the story together.

instead it feels like she built the bubble and stays in the bubble. she's sad her cool business idea outgrew her, that the fifty million dollars she got as a severance package doesn't fill the hole in her heart she got by helping people directly. which is neat and all, but, like. what about all the uninsured and poor Black people who never got to even try to see if psychedelics could help? what about the Native Americans who watched their spiritual medicine, for which they were (and still are) punished heavily for using, get used to make Learie's millions, for which they will never see a penny? what about your overworked staff, Learie!?

from a persuasive and political perspective, to me it seems the non-sequitur ending leaves the entire story up for ideological grabs. think it sounds like capitalism is bad? sure, go for it. think the problem is that we need to do capitalism, But Better™? sure, go for it! hell, that's basically the author's own conclusion:

But what we really need are psychedelic models for business - business that defines new standards for integrity, equity and ethics; business reimagined with a technicolor glow.

sorry, but a can of glow-in-the-dark paint over the same old exploitative business practices is not a solution. it's just more marketing. where is this even going?

If you feel called to share a message with the world, consider taking the course to work with David, and gain structure, fellowship with changemakers, and accountability to breathe life into your story.

a $3,000 value course for only $999! what a steal!! order now, seats are first-come first-serve!

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

truly one of the thought leaders in philosophy. surely no one has ever... oh wait, no, you're about 2400 years too late

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Instead of calling you a misogynist pig

no one said this

this isn't TiA, you don't have to make up angry feminists to be mad at anymore. you're free now

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

If the house doesn’t have a roof, don’t paint the walls.

i adore this line. because yeah, what i see the rest of the tech industry doing is either:

  • scrambling to erect their own, faster, better, cheaper roofless house
  • scrambling to sell furniture and utilities for the people who are definitely, inevitably going to move in
  • or making a ton of bank by selling resources to the first two groups

without even stopping to ask: why would anyone want to live here?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ebu

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 year ago