drq

joined 5 years ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

@tamal3 is right.

Fucking hell, people, go touch some grass, go meet real human beings. Not everybody adheres to the moral code you construct in your head, and that is FINE!!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

@infinite_ass What about everyone else? Will my friends be happy and secure with it? People I don't know or care about? Hell, even my enemies?

I highly doubt it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

@infinite_ass

> This chip was put there by very good, smart people who want only the best for the world.

Which version of the "best for the world" are we talking? Your "best for the world" does not necessarily match my "best for the world".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

@DrunkenPirate I'd accept this argument if it were still 1950s.

The year is 2024. Now we know better what to do with nuclear waste.

First, it's actually crazy recyclable. You can separate plutonium and unreacted uranium from fission products and use it again, making your fuel cycle way more efficient.

Second, you don't actually need to store the leftover fission products in an on-ground dump, that's actually mighty dumb. Instead, the borehole disposal can be used. Basically, drill a hole several kilometers deep - that's easy enough when you take the drilling equipment from all those oil barons - put your fission products in there (they're quite compact by volume, if you separate it out) and then seal the hole with concrete. Nobody's going to dig this up ever again. It's a solved problem.

Cleaning up sites like Sellafield is just dealing with the wartime legacy, when nuclear research was less about energy production, and more about bombs. It doesn't have to be this way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

@UltraGiGaGigantic It's the only way to fight, though.

@TheImpressiveX

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

@bstix You don't have to be rich to be an asshole, but you almost certainly have to be an asshole to get rich.

@UltraGiGaGigantic

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

@DrunkenPirate

> I prefer the easy way of living.

There is no such thing as "easy way of living".

Renewables suck at energy density, predictability and control.

Nuclear gives you all three.

Also, look into the solar panel manufacturing costs to the environment.

Of course, renewables are a must. But by dismantling nuclear you kneecapped yourselves, guys, big time.

@dragonfucker

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

@Artemis_Mystique No.

It changed my view on how true to their ideas some people are.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

@jatone Every video and every model will be overly simplistic when applied to any reality. Every abstraction is a leaky abstraction.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

@rocci I want this as a poll format option in the Fediverse.

view more: next ›