What are they a carrot?

There is a metadata protocol called opengraph, it's how apps get the information to display a rich preview. Basically the app takes the link as it's written in the SMS message or Twitter thread and then it tries to fetch that page and then read the open graph metadata from inside. That should give it enough to show a title description and a background image, considering the web developers implemented opengraph.

If Google is planning to use their own servers basically as a proxy then all this means is that the opengraph rich metadata is going to be a little more stale than if the app just fetch the page and generated the rich metadata itself

One thing I always stay weary of is all the details that were removed from the court records to fit it into a news report. Like you can't include everything and what I find out whenever I look deeper then it's not as horrible as what I thought it was.. then next time I see an article like this I don't read it bc I already know that this article is going to be just as bad as the last ones.

It's kinda like 'wolf' has been cried to me basically all my life.. like what kind of emergency/bad-thing do I actually need to respond too.

So Activpub needs an actor with an inbox and outbox to send and receive content. A did is a virtual actor that reroutes to a real actor and collects content across real actors.

Gpg public keys have a dedicated email address field. And if you don't want to share your "real" email address then just make a new one. (edit) Or don't include one.

And the did stores ur profile picture a public key display names bio etc etc.

Yeah that's a pain point I experienced with Gpg armored packets, I couldn't figure out a way to pack in a PFP. Even shrinking it to 64x64 made the public key file feel too heavy. So I just decided profile pics are out of scope and you should just use gravatar.

U could use pgp as the key in the did if the devs want to support it as a cryptography protocol. The did is also used to sign each message similar to pgp. U simply need more functionality than what pgp provides.

I 80% agree. I do wish PGP armored packets had extra fields and if that's an RFC that could be sent to the Gnupg maintainers then gpg would be absolutely perfect but I haven't gotten around to figuring that out. All things considered since GnuPG already exists and it's already installable everywhere and it already works I figured I could just roll with it for userless atleast. I want to use GPG for all user authentication related concerns.

Whelp here I go again

Why not GPG!!??

I've been working on my own idea for what the "fediverse" should be, I'm calling it userless because I want to avoid users in the database and I wanna use GPG as the individuals identity because it already exists and can yes perfectly verify for me who created a post, I'm not sure why we need more than that.

I haven't flushed the whole thing out yet and I plan to hand write proper docs for the protocol.

But GPG has been around since forever. I've been told that it's too hard to use, it's insecure, it's too old. And when I use the thing I just don't agree, there is nothing technically wrong with the product like it should be way more popular.

I still use sshfs. I can't be bothered to set up anything else I just want something that works out of the box.

🤔 that's not a bad idea

DS9 Pale Moonlight: is my second favorite startrek episode. This is like the deepest exploration into a starfleet captain and how easy it is to lose yourself to corruption and operate outside of your government even when you're working towards the same goal.

VOY The Thaw: an unironic cathartic watch. I'm ready invested in the characters and I get to see A1 star trek grade acting actually brings me back to that episode.

Can we get one with impedance?

How do I buy bitcoin?

I'm so confident that Google is just reskinning the same messaging app

I use it everywhere. Google me. I don't care